W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2000

RE: the WAVE accessibility evaluator

From: David M Clark <david@davidsaccess.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 11:05:52 -0500
To: "Leonard R. Kasday" <kasday@acm.org>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Cc: <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <NBBBKFCIMINNPJHJJJBGIEAOEPAA.david@davidsaccess.com>

This is a real step forward. Well done.


David M. Clark
Director of Accessibility
Email: dclark@halftheplanet.com  URL: http://www.halftheplanet.com
Boston Office: 617/859-3069 (phone/fax)

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org]On Behalf
Of Leonard R. Kasday
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2000 5:14 PM
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Cc: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
Subject: the WAVE accessibility evaluator

This is to announce a beta version of a new tool to help evaluate
accessibility of Web sites.  It's called the WAVE (Web accessibility Visual
Evaluator) http://www.temple.edu/inst_disabilities/piat/wave/ .  The WAVE
superimposes icons and labels on a web page to show what information is
available via ALT text and applet alternatives, and show the reading
order.  This gives a person a quick way to compare the ALT text with the
images, and the applet alternatives with the Applets.  It also helps the
user see if the reading order makes sense.   In addition, missing,
suspicious, and blank ALT text are flagged for scrutiny.  In other words,
the focus is to help a person make the basic manual checks needed to
evaluate accessibility.

Is the WAVE itself accessible?  That's an interesting question.  On the one
hand, the WAVE's input form and annotations are accessible.  However, in
its present form the WAVE doesn't seem to be that useful to a person who is
blind.  For example,  presenting the ALT text next to an image helps a
sighted person check the quality of the ALT text, but it doesn't help a
person who doesn't see the image. I'm looking for suggestions to make the
WAVE more useful to people who are blind.

This is the first release.  Although I tried to handle the most common
problems, there are lots of checkpoints it doesn't cover, especially
checkpoints dealing with disabilities other than blindness.  Also, for
pages with frames, it just shows the NOFRAME output, if any (although you
can copy the URI's of the individual frames--e.g. using Netscape's right
click menu--into the WAVE and look at them one at a time.)  Work is ongoing
to add these features.

The WAVE was developed at Pennsylvania's Institute on Assistive Technology,
a program of the Institute on Disabilities/UAP at Temple University, and
incorporates techniques and suggestions from the WAI Evaluation and Repair
Tools Interest Group.

If you have brief feedback of a general nature,
     please post it to this list (the wai interest group list,

If you have detailed feedback,
     please post it to the author, Len Kasday ( kasday@acm.org ) and/or the
Evaluation and Repair Interest Group ( w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org   ... note the
"er" in that address).

Please respond by April 6, although of course suggestions at any time are

Leonard R. Kasday, Ph.D.
Institute on Disabilities/UAP, and
Department of Electrical Engineering
Temple University
423 Ritter Annex, Philadelphia, PA 19122


(215) 204-2247 (voice)
(800) 750-7428 (TTY)
Received on Friday, 17 March 2000 11:09:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:07 UTC