W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2000

RE: Definitions

From: Bruce Bailey <bbailey@clark.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 17:22:25 -0500
To: "Charles McCathieNevile" <charles@w3.org>
Cc: "Kynn Bartlett" <kynn-hwg@idyllmtn.com>, "Web Accessibility Initiative" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <002001bf95df$6ee1ca40$53fe330a@msde>
Yes, I know the definition uses the word "significant", and when not among
the choir, I tow the party line on this.  Still, aside from the linearlized
table issue (which IMHO should be P1 anyway) could you please give me a few
real world examples (hypothetical even) where addressing a P2 checkpoint or
two makes a real difference?  Thanks.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Charles McCathieNevile [mailto:charles@w3.org]
> Sent: Monday, March 20, 2000 5:09 PM
> To: Bruce Bailey
> Cc: Kynn Bartlett; Web Accessibility Initiative
> Subject: Re: Definitions (Was RE: WAMM! -- I-Can Online)
> Actually I agree with Kynn. The priority scheme says that if you
> don't meet
> level-A there are some group or groups of people who are not able
> to access
> the content. Priority 2 - double-A - includes all the things that are
> important  to remobing barriers which put some people at a significant
> disadvantage in trying to access content.
Received on Friday, 24 March 2000 17:25:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:08 UTC