Datatypes: the Bermuda Triangle, and how to fly over it.
Modeling untidiness in tidy graphs
Datatyping Summary V3
Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-31
Datatyping: questions about TDL proposal
Datatypes and xml:lang
Datatyping Summary V2
- Re: Datatyping Summary V2
- Re: Datatyping Summary V2
- Re: Datatyping Summary V2
- Re: Datatyping Summary V2
RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-01-24
weekly call for agenda items
Revised MT document
Agenda items for the f2f
Datatypes: forming an opinion
Re: Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com, patrick.stickler@nokia.com, jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com, jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
- Revised MT document
- Re: Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com, patrick.stickler@nokia.com, jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com, jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
And another nit (http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/users/phayes/w3-rdf-mt-draft-J.html)
Retract test suite message
Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com, patrick.stickler@nokia.com, jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com, jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
- http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/users/phayes/w3-rdf-mt-draft-J.html
- Re: Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com, patrick.stickler@nokia.com, jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com, jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
- Model theory update (was: Re: Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com, patrick.stickler@nokia.com, jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com, jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com)
Datatyping desiderata (take 4) without embedded CSS
Datatyping Summary
- Re: Datatyping Summary
- Re: Datatyping Summary
- FW: Datatyping Summary
- Re: Datatyping Summary
- Re: Datatyping Summary
- Re: Datatyping Summary
- RE: Datatyping Summary
- Re: Datatyping Summary
- RE: Datatyping Summary
update to MT document
Datatyping MT agreement
Implementing S
For untidiness ...
Can't live with S and tidy graphs
Tidy literal nodes incompatable with current MT?
- RE: Tidy literal nodes incompatable with current MT?
- RE: Tidy literal nodes incompatable with current MT?
cannot work with reification proposal 1
- Re: cannot work with reification proposal 1
- Re: cannot work with reification proposal 1
- Re: cannot work with reification proposal 1
primer update
Why I cannot live with S
- Re(buttal): Why I cannot live with S
Can't live with TDL and untidy literals
Datatyping desiderata, take 4
TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement
- RE: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement
- RE: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement
- Re: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement
- RE: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement
Datatyping differences
Final draft of TDL proposal
Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-25
direct CVS access to W3C site
Issue mime-types-for-rdf-docs
Test cases for proposal: unrecognized attributes in the xml namespace should be ignored.
TDL Model Theory
- Re: TDL Model Theory
- Re: TDL Model Theory
- Re: TDL Model Theory
- Re: TDL Model Theory
- Re: TDL Model Theory
call for agenda items
Re: RDF Issue #rdfms-qname-uri-mapping
Fwd: TAG issues during technical plenary
Datatyping: revised draft
use/mention and reification
- Re: use/mention and reification
- Re: use/mention and reification
- Re: use/mention and reification
- Re: use/mention and reification
- Re: use/mention and reification
- Re: use/mention and reification
- Re: use/mention and reification
- Re: use/mention and reification
- Re: use/mention and reification
- Re: use/mention and reification
- Re: use/mention and reification
- Re: use/mention and reification
- Re: use/mention and reification
- Re: use/mention and reification
- Re: use/mention and reification
- Re: use/mention and reification
- Re: use/mention and reification
- Re: use/mention and reification
- Re: use/mention and reification
- Re: use/mention and reification
- Re: use/mention and reification
- Re: use/mention and reification
- Re: use/mention and reification
- Re: use/mention and reification
- Re: use/mention and reification
- Re: use/mention and reification
- Proposals? Re: use/mention and reification
- Re: use/mention and reification
Missing messages
Telecon 2002-01-18 minutes
MT containing containers
xml:base testcase draft: base and embedded hyperlink interactions
Datatyping desiderata - take 3
Review of MT
- Re: Review of MT
- Re: Review of MT
- literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT)
- Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT)
- Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT)
- Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT)
- Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT)
- Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT)
- Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT)
- literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT)
- Re: Review of MT
Problem with TDL
review MT draft
- Re: review MT draft
- Re: review MT draft
- Re: review MT draft
- Re: review MT draft
- Re: review MT draft
- Re: review MT draft
- Re: review MT draft
Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-18
Preview of working draft for TLD (PD) datatyping scheme proposal
ISSUE http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#mime-types-for-rdf-docs
ISSUE http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-nested-bagIDs
- Re: ISSUE http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-nested-bagIDs
- Re: ISSUE http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-nested-bagIDs
Datatyping desiderata, take 2
Fwd: Re: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion
Extracted/Tweaked Datatyping "foundation" document
Datatyping Document Partitioning
ACTION: 2002-01-11#9, done
Action 2002-01-11#3 reification issue
ACTION 2002-01-11#5 done
ISSUE http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-xml-base
ACTION re: Review test cases on para 196
RDF Core telecon 2002-01-11 draft minutes
Review of MT
RDF datatyping goals (action from teleconference)
- RE: RDF datatyping goals (action from teleconference)
- Re: RDF datatyping goals (action from teleconference)
Diagrams showing Cohabitation of P and D Idioms per PD Model
On the elegance of P/P+
Diagrams for PDU "Pairing" Data Type Model and Interpretation of P/P+/D/U idioms
Clarification about recent terminology
Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-11
- RE: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-11
- Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-11
- Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-11
- Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-11
- Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-11
Question about "cohabitation" of S idioms A and B
- Re: Question about "cohabitation" of S idioms A and B
- Re: Question about "cohabitation" of S idioms A and B
No model theory for reification?
- Re: No model theory for reification?
- Re: No model theory for reification?
- Re: No model theory for reification?
Re: not-id-and-resource-attr
Joint Committee response regarding datatyping
weekly call for agenda items
rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr
- Re: rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr
- Re: rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr
- Re: rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr
- Re: rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr
ISSUE http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-reification-required
ISSUE http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-qname-uri-mapping
ISSUE http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-replace-value
RDF datatyping
- Re: RDF datatyping