- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 16:44:36 +0000
- To: jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
- Cc: phayes@ai.uwf.edu, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Jos,
Per appendix C, I understand that this issue remains open to change as far
as Pat's MT document is concerned. Until we (the group) actually decide
what to do, I think the existing text is fine.
#g
--
At 03:30 PM 1/30/02 +0100, jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com wrote:
>[what a subject to discuss...]
>
>Pat,
>
>[about http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/users/phayes/w3-rdf-mt-draft-J.html]
>
>If XL is really a *global* mapping I assume that
>each literal node is mapped into *one-and-ony-one* literal value
>or have I misunderstood global?
>then I don't see why
>.. A literal node is a particular occurrence of a literal
>.. literal nodes are unique to each graph.
>.. several occurrences of a literal produce several rectangles with the same
>label
>.. literal nodes are not 'merged' in this way
>
>I think that the most convenient global mapping is
> XL(literal-as-simple-name) = literal-as-simple-name
>i.e. the identity mapping
>
>--
>Jos
------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne MIMEsweeper Group
Strategic Research <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
<Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
__
/\ \
/ \ \
/ /\ \ \
/ / /\ \ \
/ / /__\_\ \
/ / /________\
\/___________/
Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2002 11:46:28 UTC