- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 12:05:43 +0000
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
This issue was raised by DanC in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2001JanMar/0029.html
in which he proposes replacing the name rdf:value with other names
such as rdf:toString; or asks for the name to be confirmed.
(The wording in the issue description
http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-replace-value
is probably out-of-date given later discussion of datatyping)
I propose that we do not change the name rdf:value and close this issue.
1. Insufficient reasons to make this change
2. Will causing an existing uses to be illegal - such as as
the examples in M&S.
This proposal *does not* indicate how this name is *used*, merely
that the name in the RDF Namespace, will remain "value". I see this
as tangental to resolution of datatyping issues.
If this issue is closed, no action need be made.
Dave
Received on Tuesday, 8 January 2002 07:05:45 UTC