- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 11:00:55 +0200
- To: ext Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- CC: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On 2002-01-22 10:45, "ext Dan Brickley" <danbri@w3.org> wrote: > * Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com> [2002-01-22 10:15+0200] >> On 2002-01-21 21:00, "ext Dan Brickley" <danbri@w3.org> wrote: >> >>> On 21 Jan 2002, Dan Connolly wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, 2002-01-21 at 04:06, Jan Grant wrote: >>>>> On 18 Jan 2002, Dan Connolly wrote: >>>> [...] >>>>> I still don't understand why you can't pronounce >>>>> >>>>> <sentence> <rdf:Subject> <mary> . >>>>> >>>>> as "the sentence has a subject whose referent is (the person) Mary" - >>>>> ie, if you just change your intuition about what rdf:Subject "means" >>>>> does this go away? >>>> >>>> Well, yes. That is: it becomes completely useless to me. >>> >>> For me too. I've used RDF's reification vocab to stuff one RDF graph >>> inside another to carry it thru RDF environments without the inner graph >>> content being asserted alongside the 'outer' graph. So I second DanC's >>> point. >> >> I don't see that a reified statement constitutes assertion, per the >> present treatment where subject, predicate, etc. denote the resource >> nodes bearing URI labels rather than URI literals. > > to clarify: > I didn't say that reified statements are asserted; that would be contrary > to the letter and intent of M&S, not to mention common sense. I said that > I've been using reification as a mechanism for encoding RDF within RDF in > a non-asserted form. By 'inner graph' I meant the structure that is > encoded using rdf:Statement, rdf:predicate, rdf:object and rdf:subject. > > [objections to a position I've never held snipped] > > Sorry if my phrasing caused any confusion, > > Dan Fair enough. I misunderstood you saying that you'd prefer the value of rdf:subject, rdf:predicate, and rdf:object to all be literals rather than URI labled nodes in the graph, as that would facilitate interchange of quoted statements. My mistake. Cheers, Patrick -- Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453 Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409 Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2002 04:00:09 UTC