- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 11:33:47 -0000
- To: "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, "ext Graham Klyne" <GK@NineByNine.org>, "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: "Sergey Melnik" <melnik@db.stanford.edu>, "RDF Core" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Patrick: > Perhaps some brave soul out there who has the ability would like to take > a stab at the math for the pairing-based model I am trying very hard to > express in this troublesome and slippery natural language? In Pat's offlineness, I fear I am the most qualified. & Of your supporters I am also the most vocal in this bout! I am, unfortunately quite busy. My understanding of what is needed is - a shortish document - for rdf-interest and the community - to present the alternatives - in a way that facilitates comparison. Currently Sergey's doc presents S, and no more work is needed on S to achieve the above goal. The PD proposal is being vocally backed by Patrick + Jeremy. [Is the perl (PL?) proposal still active?] If Patrick could volunteer to lead a PD write-up (which should IMO be no more than picking out the best couple of pages of prior e-mail) I am willing to fill in *necessary* math. For the model theory though, I would be inclined to duck, pointing to some of Pat's e-mails from November and hoping that he would be able and willing to fill in the blanks when he's back online. I would also be happy to act as first (friendly) reviewer prior to a WG review. Then we would ideally want an overview doc that put the proposals side-by-side. Alternatively we could present them to the community just as two or three separate proposals. Jeremy
Received on Friday, 11 January 2002 06:34:24 UTC