- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 10:50:40 +0000
- To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Cc: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 04:42 PM 1/24/02 +0200, Patrick Stickler wrote:
> > I really meant to say:
> >> <"10",2>
> >> <"10",10>
>
>It's probably clearer to indicate that these mappings
>are within the scope of a specific datatype, e.g.
>
> BinaryNumber("10",2)
> DecimalNumber("10",10)
Trouble is, that's not what Jeremy's proposed MT says.
(All this is really emphasizing, to me at least, why it is so important to
have a proper formalism... I think I now understand what is being
proposed. Thanks for providing that, Jeremy.)
#g
------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne MIMEsweeper Group
Strategic Research <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
<Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
__
/\ \
/ \ \
/ /\ \ \
/ / /\ \ \
/ / /__\_\ \
/ / /________\
\/___________/
Received on Friday, 25 January 2002 08:28:14 UTC