- From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 14:38:24 +0100
- To: jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com
- Cc: patrick.stickler@nokia.com, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
[...] > What S requires (as you yourself have pointed out) is that there is one > literal node for each literal label and that has one interpretation. If > multiple meanings are needed that is up to the application semantics. > > What TDL requires is that different occurrences of literal nodes with the > same label have different meanings. It is an implementation detail how > literals are actually store, but the clearest exposition of the TDL position > is that the graph is untidy. Anything else is mere sophistry. that's a good summary Jeremy -- Jos
Received on Monday, 28 January 2002 08:40:29 UTC