- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 18:51:41 +0200
- To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, ext Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
I would think that the SOAP folks and other XML based packaging models may have given some thought to this as well. After all, an XML instance inside a SOAP wrapper that has xml:base attributes (if it does ?) would be a similar case as an XML instance/fragment within an RDF literal. In that regard, RDF parseType="Literal" is a packaging mechanism just like SOAP. I think the criteria of "what is relevant to the application interpreting the instance" is a good way to go insofar as applicability of xml:base attributes. Cheers, Patrick On 2002-01-18 18:34, "ext Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com> wrote: > On 2002-01-18 18:07, "ext Dan Brickley" <danbri@w3.org> wrote: > >> ... >> >> <foaf:Person foaf:name="Dan Brickley" >> xml:base="http://rdfweb.org/people/danbri/"> >> >> ... >> <h:p>An experimental <h:a > h:href="../../example.html">hyperlink</h:a></h:p> >> <!-- does the xml:base affect this hyperlink? --> > > I would say no. The xml:base is relevant if the URI is to > be expanded to complete form. But this does not happen > because the link in question is not a URI, insofar as the RDF > parser is concerned. It is part of a literal. It > is simply a sequence of characters. > > Thus whether an xml:base is in scope or not depends on > whether the *RDF parser* evaluates a relative URI, not > whether some string may sometime in the future be evaluated > as a relative URI. > > Thus, we should support xml:base wherever it occurs > in the RDF/XML, but make it clear to users that an RDF > parser does not evaluate any of the content of a literal > and therefore xml:base attributes only apply to relative > URI refs in attributes that are relevant to the RDF > parser -- i.e. rdf:resource. > > One would expect that literals with structured XML content > would retain all relative URIs -- otherwise, they loose > their modularity and portability in context of reuse. > > Well, at least that's my take on it. > > Cheers, > > Patrick > > -- > > Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453 > Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409 > Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com > > > -- Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453 Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409 Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Friday, 18 January 2002 11:50:51 UTC