Re: Datatyping Summary

At 04:17 PM 1/28/02 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote:
>On a related note, we can't go making up names in somebody else's
>namespace. If we're going to use anything other than *exactly* the
>URIs made up by the XML Schema WG, we've got to mint our own names
>in our own namespace. I didn't notice that decimal.lex and such
>were in the XML Schema WG's namespace. Let's not do that.
>(see also my "hey, kids, get off my lawn!" posting to www-rdf-interest
>a while ago)

Hmmm... I appreciate the concern here (having also seen Jonathan Borden's 
comments), but I also think that this is going to end up being incompatible 
with current CC/PP which (wrongly, it now seems) does use xsd: based URIs, 
per idiom B (as requested by reviewers).

#g


------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne                    MIMEsweeper Group
Strategic Research              <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
<Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
        __
       /\ \
      /  \ \
     / /\ \ \
    / / /\ \ \
   / / /__\_\ \
  / / /________\
  \/___________/

Received on Monday, 28 January 2002 18:11:52 UTC