RE: Datatyping Summary V2

I responded to DanC on RDF-interest, RDF-logic

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-logic/2002Jan/0037.html

I started from Dan's most recent version of the problem and concluded:
   "TDL is backwards compatible and S isn't."

More to the point, on bended knee 

"Can't we just drop this one -- please, pretty, pretty please with a cherry
on top?"

we have done it to death.

Jeremy


> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Brian McBride
> Sent: 31 January 2002 11:00
> To: Patrick Stickler; RDF Core
> Subject: Re: Datatyping Summary V2
> 
> 
> At 10:57 31/01/2002 +0200, Patrick Stickler wrote:
> 
> [...]
> from Sergey's.
> > > Under TDL, consider the graph:
> > >
> > >  _:f <rdf:type> <film> .
> > >  _:f <dc:Title> (_, "10") .
> > >  <mary> <age>   (_, "10").
> > >
> > > Does this entail:
> > >
> > >  _:x <dc:Title> ?y .
> > >  _:z <age>      ?y .
> > >
> > > I believe there is agreement that it does not under the 
> current TDL model
> > > theory.
> >
> >No. This is not correct.
> 
> I've just chatted to Jeremy, who tells me you and he have also 
> talked this 
> morning, that Jeremy will sending out you joint position on this 
> question soon.
> 
> Brian
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 31 January 2002 07:00:49 UTC