- From: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 08:53:24 -0500
- To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- CC: ext Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Thanks; that helps. As I said in my original reply to Brian, I'm trying to keep straight what we have to actually *write* (or physically represent) in the different proposals vs. what concepts we have to be thinking about. --Frank Patrick Stickler wrote: > On 2002-01-31 0:19, "ext Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote: > > >>Hi Frank, >> >>At 16:37 30/01/2002 -0500, Frank Manola wrote: >> >>>Sorry, what do you mean by "extended n-triples representation"? >>> >>In TDL, a literal is a pair. >> > > No. In the TDL *MT* a literal is a pair. In TDL, the actual > model, a literal is a literal -- a string that may be interpreted > as a lexical form of some datatype, in the context of that > datatype. > > Please let's keep this straight. If there's a problem with > the MT for TDL, fine, but that doesn't equate to a problem > with TDL (though I appreciate that the mathematicians may > only want to look at the MT and ignore what the MT is supposed > to be capturing). > > Cheers, > > Patrick > > -- > > Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453 > Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409 > Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com > > > -- Frank Manola The MITRE Corporation 202 Burlington Road, MS A345 Bedford, MA 01730-1420 mailto:fmanola@mitre.org voice: 781-271-8147 FAX: 781-271-875
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2002 10:40:05 UTC