Re: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement

On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 15:42, Graham Klyne wrote:
> At 06:53 AM 1/28/02 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote:
> > > Two literals may be string equal, but not denote the same
> > > value.
> >
> >
> >That's one design choice. It's not the one I prefer,
> >and it's not the way the S proposal works.
> 
> Just checking... I thought that was pretty much just how S works ... a 
> literal node denotes the corresponding string value.

yes...

But PatrickS suggested that two literals could be string-equal
but denote different values. That is definitely *not*
how S works. "abc" denotes the same thing as "abc". always.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Monday, 28 January 2002 18:41:05 UTC