- From: Martyn Horner <martyn.horner@profium.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 16:07:55 +0100
- To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- CC: ext Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, Sergey Melnik <melnik@db.stanford.edu>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Patrick Stickler wrote: > > I've not seen any comments to my earlier proposal > > 'literal' the RDF/XML string representing an rdfs:Literal > 'lexical value' member of lexical space of "some" datatype > 'data value' member of value space of "some" datatype > .... > Eh? > > Patrick Patrick, I know Pat's already replied to this but I must just point out that this proposal must rule itself out on lexical grounds alone (regardless of its `value'). You've used `value' three times, once in the fundamental sense of a `value space' and then casually in a term for the other side. I also note you use `data' three times but I can only object to that on aesthetic grounds. I'd humbly suggest we restrict the use of `value' to `value space' items and use `lexical' only for syntactic items and use `data' as a free radical for both. That jumbles up your table rather messily, I'm afraid. Martyn -- Martyn Horner <martyn.horner@profium.com> Profium, Les Espaces de Sophia, Immeuble Delta, B.P. 037, F-06901 Sophia-Antipolis, France Tel. +33 (0)4.93.95.31.44 Fax. +33 (0)4.93.95.52.58 Mob. +33 (0)6.21.01.54.56 Internet: http://www.profium.com
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2002 10:08:42 UTC