Re: Datatyping Document Partitioning

Publishing #1 and #2 first also allows folks to get familiar
with the scope, terminology, and basic theory so that when
they do get the proposal documents, it has had time to settle
into their heads a bit (and if they are like me, that lead
time could be beneficial ;-)

Patrick

On 2002-01-15 9:58, "Stickler Patrick (NRC/Tampere)"
<Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com> wrote:

> 
> I don't think this came through fully clearly when I proposed it
> during the teleconf, so I'll repeat it again.
> 
> I think that we should partition the Datatyping discussion documentation
> into separate documents:
> 
> 1. Desiderata (as already done by Graham)
> 2. MT Foundation (sections 2-3 of Sergey's document)
> 3. Proposal: S
> 4. Proposal: PD
> 5. Proposal: ???
> 
> The rationale for this is that we all seem to be in agreement with
> regards to #1 and #2 above, and also, those two serve as the basis
> of comparison of the various proposals.
> 
> Also, since #1 and #2 are mostly complete, we could offer them to
> RDF Interest for review and comment while we continue our definition,
> refinement, and debate about the different proposals.
> 
> I propose that we finalize documents #1 and #2 this week and provide
> them to the community for comment -- comments which may be invaluable
> both for the definition and refinement of the proposals, which will
> be published shortly thereafter.
> 
> Eh?
> 
> Patrick
> 
> --
>              
> Patrick Stickler              Phone: +358 50 483 9453
> Senior Research Scientist     Fax:   +358 7180 35409
> Nokia Research Center         Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
> 
> 

--
               
Patrick Stickler              Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist     Fax:   +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center         Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com

Received on Tuesday, 15 January 2002 03:17:54 UTC