- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 10:49:05 +0200
- To: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
I see the need to clarify my meaning when I refer to P, P+, D, U, etc. in recent discussions. I am not speaking about the earlier, entire proposals -- including their expectations/requirements in the MT -- but only to the idioms they represent for expressing the typing of literals in the graph. In all such cases, I am talking about the (lexical_form, data_type) pairing model, previously referred to as PDU or just PD, as defined in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Nov/0579.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0060.html I apologise if this has caused any confusion. With the exception of S ;-) if in the future I mean to refer to the entire earler proposal, including those parts relating to the MT, I will say so clearly. Otherwise, I am referring only to the idioms as they relate to the PD model. Regards, Patrick -- Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453 Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409 Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Friday, 11 January 2002 03:48:26 UTC