- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 24 Jan 2002 18:04:00 -0600
- To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Cc: ext "jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com" <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>, RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 08:52, Patrick Stickler wrote: > On 2002-01-24 2:47, "ext jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com" > <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com> wrote: > > > > >> Here are the options I find acceptable: > >> > >> (a) Shoot reification on the grounds that > >> there isn't consensus about what it means > >> nor how to use it. > > I don't see how we can do this, as reification is at present > the most straightforward way to qualify statements. ?!?!? This must be some use of the word "straightforward" with which I am not familiar. All the feedback I hear about reification is "run away! run away!" I'm interested to hear about deployment of refication used in this manner, and some user community that found it to be straightforward. [...] -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2002 19:04:03 UTC