Re: Tidy literal nodes incompatable with current MT?

On 2002-01-28 15:38, "ext jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com"
<jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com> wrote:

> [...]
> 
>> What S requires (as you yourself have pointed out) is that there is one
>> literal node for each literal label and that has one interpretation. If
>> multiple meanings are needed that is up to the application semantics.
>> 
>> What TDL requires is that different occurrences of literal nodes with the
>> same label have different meanings. It is an implementation detail how
>> literals are actually store, but the clearest exposition of the TDL position
>> is that the graph is untidy. Anything else is mere sophistry.

I agree.

> that's a good summary Jeremy
>
> --
> Jos

I agree with that, too ;-)

Patrick

--
               
Patrick Stickler              Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist     Fax:   +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center         Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com

Received on Monday, 28 January 2002 09:42:22 UTC