- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 08:35:21 +0200
- To: ext Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>, Martyn Horner <martyn.horner@profium.com>
- CC: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On 2002-01-18 0:43, "ext Graham Klyne" <GK@NineByNine.org> wrote: >> Also, I lost the point of the list of idiom examples: idiom B and idiom >> P are shown to be the same (modulo prefix). Have I missed something? > > No, you didn't miss anything. I didn't merge them (yet) in case some > idiomatic differences between B and P emerge in subsequent discussions. I > think there might be some more complex combinations of statements that > don't work in the same way under those proposals. As I pointed out, P and B cannot be merged. The semantics of the rdfs:range values are significantly different. They do not express the same knowledge, and I would suggest that the examples for A and B follow the S conventions using '.map' and '.lex' suffixes, or that all idiom examples be omitted from the "common" desiderada document and addressed solely in each proposal. Cheers, Patrick -- Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453 Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409 Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Friday, 18 January 2002 01:34:30 UTC