- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 17:00:56 +0000
- To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
I like this proposal.
#g
--
At 02:48 PM 1/9/02 +0000, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>Given that I objected to the proposed resolution of this issue at the last
>meeting I have been asked to provide an alternative resolution.
>
>
>My proposal:
>
> An rdf:ID attribute is permissable on all property elements and always
>refers to the resource that is the reification of the triple corresponding
>to that property element.
>
>
>
>Notes:
> - this allows rdf:ID and rdf:resource on the same property element which
>is a change.
> - this favours a reading of the relevant contradiction in M&S in which
>para232 is dropped and para214 is preferred.
>
>Reasons for this are:
> - M&S is contradictory and has widely varying implementations of its
>reification syntax.
> - This WG must resolve the contradiction.
> - My proposed resolution is very simple, and hence makes reification
>significantly more usable, and less of a barrier to RDF take-up.
>
>More detail in:
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0365.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0374.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0381.html
>
>I will post a follow-up with some implementation details.
>
>Jeremy
------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne MIMEsweeper Group
Strategic Research <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
<Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
__
/\ \
/ \ \
/ /\ \ \
/ / /\ \ \
/ / /__\_\ \
/ / /________\
\/___________/
Received on Wednesday, 9 January 2002 12:06:00 UTC