- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 30 Jan 2002 09:44:25 -0600
- To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Cc: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Sergey Melnik <melnik@db.stanford.edu>
On Tue, 2002-01-29 at 03:19, Patrick Stickler wrote: [...] > I believe that Jeremy's recent 1984 example (in > addition to other examples provided over the past > few days) clearly demonstrates that a literal > does not have consistent global meaning. No, you have not established that as fact. I accept it as your preferred design choice, and I accept that you find S unacceptable in various ways, but S is a coherent design wherein "1984" does have a consistent global meaning. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2002 10:45:17 UTC