- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 18:24:01 -0000
- To: "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, "ext Graham Klyne" <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Cc: "RDF Core" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
> >> > >> Nodes labelled with URIs map to resources > >> Nodes labelled with strings map to pairs > >> Blank nodes can map to either resources or pairs. > > > > Er, what happens with: > > > > ex:someURI rdf:value "12345" . > > > > ? That one is ill-formed, according to the current document, somewhat like saying that "10" is both a binary and a decimal integer. We could perhaps allow URIs to be interpreted as resources or pairs. Basically permitting literals as resources. I haven't thought that one through. > > Good question. The same goes for > > ex:someURI rdf:value ex:someOtherURI . That one indicates that the two URIs refer to the same resource. > > Jeremy
Received on Sunday, 27 January 2002 13:24:03 UTC