W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > January 2002

RE: Re(buttal): Why I cannot live with S

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 19:38:26 -0000
To: "Sergey Melnik" <melnik@db.stanford.edu>, "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Cc: "RDF Core" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JAEBJCLMIFLKLOJGMELDOENPCCAA.jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
> As a developer, I don't have an option. With TDL-RDF, all of my own
> applications in mediation, model management, backend storage etc. would
> technically become non-RDF applications, or applications "formally known
> as complying with the deprecated RDF 1.0" ;) I don't see any practical
> benefit in migrating all existing code to TDL, and I might not be a
> single implementor out there.

I would like to better understand this.

The intent in the TDL model theory was that an interpretation with no
supported types was the same as the current model theory. I suspect this
boils down to the tidy versus untidy literal nodes issue.

Tidiness had already vanished from the latest editors draft of the model
theory, which is the one I was working from.

Is that right?

Received on Friday, 25 January 2002 14:38:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:08 UTC