W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > January 2002

ISSUE http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-nested-bagIDs

From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 15:49:38 +0000
To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <18411.1011109778@tatooine.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>
Raised by Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN in

   The Model and Syntax specification does not clearly specify which
   reified statements are put in which bag when nested description
   elements have bagID's.

I propose we close this by resolving:

  Nested rdf:Description elements with rdf:bagIDs generate the same
  triples as top-level rdf:Description elements with rdf:bagIDs.
  Specifically, triples generated as a result of nested
  rdf:Description elements do not get included in bags associated
  with outer rdf:Description elements.

(sort of based on the resolution attached to Jeremy's mail

 -- I hope I got this right

With respect to Pierre-Antoine's question
  What model should the following RDF piece return ?

The first attachment test001.rdf contains an updated and completed
version of his example.  (Iadded the rdf:RDF, updated the attributes
to be rdf:*, and made absolute URIs)

By this resolution it is equivalent to the attached test002.rdf, with
the inner rdf:Description moved to the outer level.

And both generate the same N-Triples

However, since IDs/bagIDs are being used, the URLs generated are
relative to the location of the RDF/XML files so there are two result
N-Triples files. The final test case files will be below
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-nested-bagIDs/ so
they are calculated relative to that


Received on Tuesday, 15 January 2002 10:49:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:08 UTC