- From: <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 16:26:20 GMT
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Time: 10:00:00 Fri Jan 18 2002 in America/New York which is equivalent to 15:00:00 Fri Jan 18 2002 in Europe/London Phone: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)#7332 irc: irc.openprojects.net #rdfcore 1: Allocate scribe 2: Roll Call 3: Review Agenda 4: Next telecon - 10am Boston time, 25 Jan 2002 5: Please register for the face to face meeting. See: http://cgi.w3.org/Register/selectUser.pl?_w3c_meetingName=techplenary2002 6: Review Minutes of 2002-01-11 with correction See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0095.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0097.html 7: Confirm Status of Completed Actions ACTION: 2001-12-14#3 Jeremy Carroll Review Model Theory WD see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0094.html ACTION: 2001-12-14#8 Jan Grant look at #rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr closely see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0043.html ACTION: 2002-01-11#3 bwm Ensure we have an issue to clarify the semantics of reification see: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-identity-of-statements ACTION: 2002-01-11#4 bwm update the rdfms-replace-value issue with text based on Aaron's proposal see: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-replace-value ACTION: 2002-01-11#5 DaveB remove rdfms-replace-value from the list of issues affecting the syntax see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0099.html ACTION: 2002-01-11#9 graham Publish a list of desiderata for data typing (Start from Sergey see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0091.html ACTION: 2002-01-11#10: bwm add item on registering for F2F to telecon agenda for 18/Jan/2002 8: Reification Time to reactivate discussion? 9: Status of Test Cases WD ACTION: 2001-11-30#3 Jan Grant Get access to test case areas of W3C site ACTION: 2002-01-11#2 JanG post summary of Test Cases WD outstanding updates to list. ACTION: 2002-01-11#1 bwm persue CVS access for Jan with EM 10: Status of Primer 11: Model Theory WD Actions: 2001-12-14#2 Jos De Roo Review Model Theory WD 2001-12-14#2 Patrick Stickler Review Model Theory WD This will be an urgent reminder to folks to complete their review. See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2002Jan/att-0007/01-RDF_Model_Theory.htm http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0000.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0094.html 12: Unrecognised xml: attributes Propose: The WG resolves that unrecognised attributes in the xml namespace should be ignored. 13: Issue: #rdfms-xml-base See DaveB's excellent summary of the discussion to date - url below. Propose: The WG confirms it's previous decision that where RDF is embedded in an XML document, and that RDF is within the scope of an xml:base, then then an RDF parser will use the value of the xml:base attribute as the base for resolving relative URI's. The WG confirms its previous decision that xml:base attributes within an RDF/XML document will be ignored. The WG actions DaveB to reflect these decisions in the syntax document. Action ??? to create test cases to reflect these decisions. This is be closed. See: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-xml-base http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0098.html 14: Issue: #rdfms-nested-bagIDs Summary: The Model and Syntax specification does not clearly specify which reified statements are put in which bag when nested description elements have bagID's. Propose: o the WG resolves: Nested rdf:Description elements with rdf:bagIDs generate the same triples as top-level rdf:Description elements with rdf:bagIDs. Specifically, triples generated as a result of nested rdf:Description elements do not get included in bags associated with outer rdf:Description elements. o the WG approves test cases 1 and 2 in DaveB's message - url below o this issue be closed See: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-nested-bagIDs http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0113.html 15: Issue: #mime-types-for-rdf-docs Propose o the WG authorize DaveB to add text as outlined in his proposal - url below o this issue be removed from the list affecting the syntax WD See: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#mime-types-for-rdf-docs http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0114.html 16: Issue: #rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr Discuss Jeremy and Jan's proposals. See: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0018.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0034.html 17: Datatypes 2002-01-11#6 miked to drop an example of both approaches (implicit / explicit) to datatyping to the mailing list. Status. See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0109.html http://www-nrc.nokia.com/sw/TDL.html ------------------------------------------------------------ This agenda was produced by Jema, the Jena WG assistant
Received on Thursday, 17 January 2002 11:26:38 UTC