w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from January 2002 by author

Aaron Swartz

• Re: ISSUE http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-replace-value (Wednesday, 9 January)

Brian McBride

• Datatyping Summary V3 (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-01-24 (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: Datatyping Summary V2 (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: Datatyping Summary (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Datatyping Summary V2 (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Datatyping Summary (Wednesday, 30 January)
• weekly call for agenda items (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Datatyping Summary (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Agenda items for the f2f (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Datatypes: forming an opinion (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Datatyping Summary (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: FW: Datatyping Summary (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Datatyping Summary (Monday, 28 January)
• primer update (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Friday, 25 January)
• direct CVS access to W3C site (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: review MT draft (Thursday, 24 January)
• call for agenda items (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: review MT draft (Monday, 21 January)
• Fwd: TAG issues during technical plenary (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: Missing messages (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: review MT draft (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: Review of MT (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: Review of MT (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: ISSUE http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-nested-bagIDs (Thursday, 17 January)
• Action 2002-01-11#3 reification issue (Monday, 14 January)
• Re: RDF Core telecon 2002-01-11 draft minutes (Monday, 14 January)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-11 (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-11 (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: Question about "cohabitation" of S idioms A and B (Thursday, 10 January)
• weekly call for agenda items (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Fwd: Reminder: Jan 10: W3C I18N Workshop deadline (Monday, 7 January)

bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com

• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-31 (Thursday, 31 January)
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-25 (Thursday, 24 January)
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-18 (Thursday, 17 January)
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-11 (Thursday, 10 January)

Dan Brickley

• Re: cannot work with reification proposal 1 (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Monday, 21 January)
• xml:base testcase draft: base and embedded hyperlink interactions (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: No model theory for reification? (Thursday, 10 January)

Dan Connolly

• Re: Datatyping Summary (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Datatyping Summary (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Agenda items for the f2f (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Datatyping Summary (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Datatyping Summary (Wednesday, 30 January)
• RE: Datatyping Summary (Tuesday, 29 January)
• RE: Datatyping Summary (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Datatyping Summary (Monday, 28 January)
• relating S-A and S-B [was: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement] (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Datatyping differences (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Datatyping differences (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Datatyping differences (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement (Monday, 28 January)
• RE: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: Datatyping differences (Friday, 25 January)
• TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: Proposals? Re: use/mention and reification (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: Proposals? Re: use/mention and reification (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Monday, 21 January)
• use/mention and reification (Friday, 18 January)

Dave Beckett

• Re: Datatypes and xml:lang (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: Agenda items for the f2f (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Datatypes and xml:lang (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: update to MT document (Monday, 28 January)
• Issue mime-types-for-rdf-docs (Thursday, 24 January)
• Test cases for proposal: unrecognized attributes in the xml namespace should be ignored. (Thursday, 24 January)
• ISSUE http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#mime-types-for-rdf-docs (Tuesday, 15 January)
• ISSUE http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-nested-bagIDs (Tuesday, 15 January)
• ACTION 2002-01-11#5 done (Monday, 14 January)
• ISSUE http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-xml-base (Monday, 14 January)
• ACTION re: Review test cases on para 196 (Monday, 14 January)
• ISSUE http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-reification-required (Tuesday, 8 January)
• ISSUE http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-qname-uri-mapping (Tuesday, 8 January)
• ISSUE http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-replace-value (Tuesday, 8 January)

Eric Miller

• RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-01-24 (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: direct CVS access to W3C site (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: RDF "data model" (was comments on syntax draft) (Thursday, 3 January)

Frank Manola

• Re: Datatyping Summary (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: Datatyping Summary (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: primer update (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Friday, 25 January)
• Thoughts on Reification: was: Re: Proposals? Re: use/mention and reification (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Tuesday, 22 January)
• apologies for 2002-01-18 telecon (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-11 (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: RDF "data model" (was comments on syntax draft) (Thursday, 3 January)
• Re: RDF "data model" (was comments on syntax draft) (Thursday, 3 January)

Graham Klyne

• Re: Datatyping Summary V2 (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Datatyping Summary (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Datatyping: revised draft (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Revised MT document (Wednesday, 30 January)
• And another nit (http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/users/phayes/w3-rdf-mt-draft-J.html) (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Datatyping Summary (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Datatyping Summary (Wednesday, 30 January)
• http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/users/phayes/w3-rdf-mt-draft-J.html (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Datatyping Summary (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Datatyping desiderata (take 4) without embedded CSS (Tuesday, 29 January)
• RE: Datatyping Summary (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: Datatyping Summary (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: update to MT document (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: Datatyping Summary (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Datatyping: revised draft (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: update to MT document (Monday, 28 January)
• Circumstance, provenance and partial knowledge (Monday, 28 January)
• Actions 2002-01-18#7, 2002-01-18#8 (Monday, 28 January)
• RE: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement (Sunday, 27 January)
• Re: Proposals? Re: use/mention and reification (Friday, 25 January)
• RE: TDL Model Theory (Friday, 25 January)
• Datatyping desiderata, take 4 (Friday, 25 January)
• RE: TDL Model Theory (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: TDL Model Theory (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: Proposals? Re: use/mention and reification (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: Test cases for proposal: unrecognized attributes in the xml namespace should be ignored. (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: DATATYPING: second draft (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: TDL Model Theory (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: TDL Model Theory (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: Fwd: TAG issues during technical plenary (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: RDF Issue #rdfms-qname-uri-mapping (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: RDF Issue #rdfms-qname-uri-mapping (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: Datatyping desiderata - take 3 (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: Datatyping desiderata, take 2 (Friday, 18 January)
• Missing messages (Friday, 18 January)
• Telecon 2002-01-18 minutes (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: Datatyping desiderata, take 2 (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: Datatyping desiderata, take 2 (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: Datatyping desiderata, take 2 (Friday, 18 January)
• Datatyping desiderata - take 3 (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: Datatyping desiderata, take 2 (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: RDF datatyping goals (action from teleconference) (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Datatyping desiderata, take 2 (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Re: RDF datatyping goals (action from teleconference) (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Fwd: Re: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion (Tuesday, 15 January)
• ACTION: 2002-01-11#9, done (Monday, 14 January)
• RE: RDF datatyping goals (action from teleconference) (Sunday, 13 January)
• RDF datatyping goals (action from teleconference) (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: Question about "cohabitation" of S idioms A and B (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: Question about "cohabitation" of S idioms A and B (Friday, 11 January)
• RE: RDF datatyping (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-11 (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: No model theory for reification? (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: RDF datatyping (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: No model theory for reification? (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: weekly call for agenda items (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: RDF datatyping (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: weekly call for agenda items (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr (Wednesday, 9 January)
• RDF datatyping (Monday, 7 January)
• Primer - some comments (Thursday, 3 January)
• Re: RDF "data model" (was comments on syntax draft) (Thursday, 3 January)
• Re: RDF "data model" (was comments on syntax draft) (Thursday, 3 January)
• Re: rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr (Thursday, 3 January)
• US spelling serialization (sic) (Thursday, 3 January)
• Re: DATATYPING: second draft (Thursday, 3 January)
• RE: Question about S (Thursday, 3 January)
• RDF "data model" (was comments on syntax draft) (Thursday, 3 January)
• Review of 14-Dec-2001 RDF model theory document (Wednesday, 2 January)

Jan Grant

• Re: Proposals? Re: use/mention and reification (Friday, 25 January)
• Proposals? Re: use/mention and reification (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Monday, 21 January)
• RDF Core telecon 2002-01-11 draft minutes (Monday, 14 January)
• Re: RDF datatyping (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: RDF datatyping (Friday, 11 January)
• RE: RDF datatyping (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr (Thursday, 10 January)
• RE: not-id-and-resource-attr (Thursday, 10 January)
• RE: not-id-and-resource-attr (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: not-id-and-resource-attr (Thursday, 10 January)

Jeremy Carroll

• RE: Datatyping Summary V2 (Thursday, 31 January)
• RE: Datatyping: questions about TDL proposal (Thursday, 31 January)
• RE: Datatyping Summary V2 (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: Datatyping: questions about TDL proposal (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: Datatyping Summary V2 (Thursday, 31 January)
• RE: Datatyping Summary (Wednesday, 30 January)
• RE: Datatyping Summary - test suite, 2nd attempt (Wednesday, 30 January)
• RE: Datatyping Summary (Wednesday, 30 January)
• RE: Datatyping Summary - test suite, 2nd attempt (Wednesday, 30 January)
• RE: Datatyping Summary (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Retract test suite message (Wednesday, 30 January)
• RE: Datatyping Summary (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Datatyping Summary (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Datatyping Summary (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Datatyping Summary (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: update to MT document (Tuesday, 29 January)
• RE: Datatyping Summary (Tuesday, 29 January)
• RE: Datatyping Summary (Tuesday, 29 January)
• RE: Datatyping Summary (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Datatyping MT agreement (Monday, 28 January)
• Implementing S (Monday, 28 January)
• For untidiness ... (Monday, 28 January)
• Monotonicity (Monday, 28 January)
• RE: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement (Monday, 28 January)
• Can't live with S and tidy graphs (Monday, 28 January)
• RE: Tidy literal nodes incompatable with current MT? (Monday, 28 January)
• RE: TDL is compatible with tidy literals, even if current TDL MT is not (which should be fixed) (Monday, 28 January)
• RE: TDL Model Theory (Sunday, 27 January)
• RE: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement (Sunday, 27 January)
• RE: Model Theory draft + tidiness (Sunday, 27 January)
• RE: Re(buttal): Why I cannot live with S (Friday, 25 January)
• RE: Re(buttal): Why I cannot live with S (Friday, 25 January)
• RE: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement (Friday, 25 January)
• RE: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement (Friday, 25 January)
• RE: TDL Model Theory (Friday, 25 January)
• RE: TDL Model Theory (Friday, 25 January)
• Datatyping differences (Friday, 25 January)
• RE: TDL Model Theory (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: TDL Model Theory (Thursday, 24 January)
• TDL Model Theory (Wednesday, 23 January)
• RE: Missing messages (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: ISSUE http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-xml-base (Friday, 18 January)
• Review of MT (Monday, 14 January)
• RE: RDF datatyping goals (action from teleconference) (Friday, 11 January)
• Co-existence (Friday, 11 January)
• RE: On the elegance of P/P+ (Friday, 11 January)
• RE: RDF datatyping (Friday, 11 January)
• RE: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-11 (Thursday, 10 January)
• RE: RDF datatyping (Thursday, 10 January)
• RE: No model theory for reification? (Thursday, 10 January)
• RE: rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr (Thursday, 10 January)
• No model theory for reification? (Thursday, 10 January)
• RE: not-id-and-resource-attr (Thursday, 10 January)
• RE: not-id-and-resource-attr (Thursday, 10 January)
• RE: not-id-and-resource-attr & bagID (Thursday, 10 January)
• RE: RDF datatyping (Thursday, 10 January)
• RE: rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr (Wednesday, 9 January)
• rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr (Wednesday, 9 January)

jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

• Re: Datatypes: the Bermuda Triangle, and how to fly over it. (Friday, 1 February)
• Re: Datatyping Summary V2 (Friday, 1 February)
• Re: cannot work with reification proposal 1 (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com, patrick.stickler@nokia.com, jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com, jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com (Wednesday, 30 January)
• RE: Datatyping Summary (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Datatyping Summary (Wednesday, 30 January)
• RE: Tidy literal nodes incompatable with current MT? (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: cannot work with reification proposal 1 (Saturday, 26 January)
• cannot work with reification proposal 1 (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: Proposals? Re: use/mention and reification (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: Proposals? Re: use/mention and reification (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: review MT draft (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: review MT draft (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: Missing messages (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: review MT draft (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: review MT draft (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: review MT draft (Saturday, 19 January)
• Re: Missing messages (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: review MT draft (Friday, 18 January)
• review MT draft (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-11 (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: No model theory for reification? (Thursday, 10 January)

Martyn Horner

• Re: Datatyping Summary (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Datatyping Summary (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: For untidiness ... (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Can't live with TDL and untidy literals (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: Datatyping desiderata, take 2 (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: ISSUE http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-nested-bagIDs (Thursday, 17 January)

Mike Dean

• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-11 (Friday, 11 January)
• Joint Committee response regarding datatyping (Thursday, 10 January)

Pat Hayes

• Re: Modeling untidiness in tidy graphs (Friday, 1 February)
• Datatypes: the Bermuda Triangle, and how to fly over it. (Friday, 1 February)
• Re: Datatyping: questions about TDL proposal (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Datatypes: forming an opinion (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Datatyping: questions about TDL proposal (Wednesday, 30 January)
• RE: Model Theory draft + tidiness (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Revised MT document (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com, patrick.stickler@nokia.com, jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com, jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/users/phayes/w3-rdf-mt-draft-J.html (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Model theory update (was: Re: Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com, patrick.stickler@nokia.com, jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com, jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com) (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com, patrick.stickler@nokia.com, jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com, jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: And another nit (http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/users/phayes/w3-rdf-mt-draft-J.html) (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com, patrick.stickler@nokia.com, jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com, jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com (Wednesday, 30 January)
• RE: Datatyping Summary (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: update to MT document (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: update to MT document (Monday, 28 January)
• update to MT document (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: TDL Model Theory (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Friday, 25 January)
• RE: No model theory for reification? (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: DATATYPING: second draft (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: TDL Model Theory (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: TAG issues during technical plenary (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: Fwd: TAG issues during technical plenary (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Review of 14-Dec-2001 RDF model theory document (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: review MT draft (Saturday, 19 January)
• Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) (Saturday, 19 January)
• literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) (Saturday, 19 January)
• Re: review MT draft (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: Datatyping desiderata, take 2 (Friday, 18 January)
• MT containing containers (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: Review of MT (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: Review of MT (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: Review of MT (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: review MT draft (Friday, 18 January)

Patrick Stickler

• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-31 (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: Datatyping Summary V2 (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: Datatyping: questions about TDL proposal (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: Datatyping Summary (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: Datatyping: questions about TDL proposal (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: Datatyping Summary (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: Datatyping Summary (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: Datatypes and xml:lang (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: Datatyping Summary (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: Datatypes and xml:lang (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: Datatyping Summary (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: Agenda items for the f2f (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: Datatyping Summary V2 (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com, patrick.stickler@nokia.com, jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com, jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: Datatyping Summary (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Datatyping Summary - test suite, 2nd attempt (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Datatyping Summary (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Datatyping Summary (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com, patrick.stickler@nokia.com, jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com, jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Datatyping Summary (Tuesday, 29 January)
• FW: Datatyping Summary (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: Datatyping Summary (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: relating S-A and S-B [was: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement] (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Can't live with S and tidy graphs (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Datatyping differences (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Tidy literal nodes incompatable with current MT? (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Datatyping differences (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Tidy literal nodes incompatable with current MT? (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Tidy literal nodes incompatable with current MT? (Monday, 28 January)
• Tidy literal nodes incompatable with current MT? (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Datatyping differences (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Can't live with TDL and untidy literals (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: TDL is compatible with tidy literals, even if current TDL MT is not (which should be fixed) (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: TDL is compatible with tidy literals, even if current TDL MT is not (which should be fixed) (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Model Theory draft + tidiness (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Re(buttal): Why I cannot live with S (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Re(buttal): Why I cannot live with S (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Datatyping differences (Monday, 28 January)
• TDL is compatible with tidy literals, even if current TDL MT is not (which should be fixed) (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: TDL Model Theory (Friday, 25 January)
• Why I cannot live with S (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: TDL Model Theory (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Friday, 25 January)
• Final draft of TDL proposal (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: No model theory for reification? (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-25 (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: DATATYPING: second draft (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: TAG issues during technical plenary (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: TDL Model Theory (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: TDL Model Theory (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: TDL Model Theory (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: TAG issues during technical plenary (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: TAG issues during technical plenary (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: use/mention and reification (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) (Saturday, 19 January)
• Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) (Saturday, 19 January)
• Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) (Saturday, 19 January)
• Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) (Saturday, 19 January)
• Re: Missing messages (Saturday, 19 January)
• Re: xml:base testcase draft: base and embedded hyperlink interactions (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: Review of MT (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: xml:base testcase draft: base and embedded hyperlink interactions (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: Datatyping desiderata - take 3 (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: Review of MT (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-18 (Friday, 18 January)
• Review of MT (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: Problem with TDL (NOT) (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: Datatyping desiderata, take 2 (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: Datatyping desiderata, take 2 (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: Datatyping desiderata, take 2 (Thursday, 17 January)
• Preview of working draft for TLD (PD) datatyping scheme proposal (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: RDF datatyping goals (action from teleconference) (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: RDF datatyping goals (action from teleconference) (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Re: RDF datatyping goals (action from teleconference) (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Re: RDF datatyping goals (action from teleconference) (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Extracted/Tweaked Datatyping "foundation" document (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Re: Datatyping Document Partitioning (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Datatyping Document Partitioning (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Re: RDF datatyping goals (action from teleconference) (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Re: RDF datatyping goals (action from teleconference) (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Re: Question about "cohabitation" of S idioms A and B (Friday, 11 January)
• Diagrams showing Cohabitation of P and D Idioms per PD Model (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-11 (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: Co-existence (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: On the elegance of P/P+ (Friday, 11 January)
• On the elegance of P/P+ (Friday, 11 January)
• Diagrams for PDU Interpretation of S/A and S/B idioms (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: RDF datatyping (Friday, 11 January)
• Diagrams for PDU "Pairing" Data Type Model and Interpretation of P/P+/D/U idioms (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: RDF datatyping (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: RDF datatyping (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: RDF datatyping (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-11 (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-11 (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: RDF datatyping (Friday, 11 January)
• Clarification about recent terminology (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: RDF datatyping (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: RDF datatyping (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: No model theory for reification? (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: Question about "cohabitation" of S idioms A and B (Friday, 11 January)
• Question about "cohabitation" of S idioms A and B (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: RDF datatyping (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: weekly call for agenda items (Thursday, 10 January)
• Comments/questions on latest draft of Sergey's Datatyping spec (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: weekly call for agenda items (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: RDF datatyping (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Question about S (Sunday, 6 January)

Sergey Melnik

• Modeling untidiness in tidy graphs (Friday, 1 February)
• Re: FW: Datatyping Summary (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Datatyping: revised draft (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Re(buttal): Why I cannot live with S (Friday, 25 January)
• Re(buttal): Why I cannot live with S (Friday, 25 January)
• Can't live with TDL and untidy literals (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) (Saturday, 19 January)
• Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT) (Saturday, 19 January)
• Re: Datatyping desiderata - take 3 (Saturday, 19 January)
• Datatyping: revised draft (Friday, 18 January)
• Problem with TDL (Friday, 18 January)

Last message date: Thursday, 31 January 2002 20:32:00 UTC