- From: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 22:43:40 +0000
- To: Martyn Horner <martyn.horner@profium.com>
- Cc: RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 01:34 PM 1/17/02 +0100, Martyn Horner wrote:
>I'd suggest you condense the redundant items in the desiderata list (it
>seems to me also that 7 restates 5 and 6 (rather than 4 and 5) and that
>4 follows from 3) - before we start using these item numbers to score
>off the proposals.
I hope we're not going to get into scoring systems... ;-)
I'll look into what you suggest, but I would like to keep the DAML+OIL
joint committee text fairly intact, at least until we are reasonably sure
we're talking about the same things.
I'm also trying to be very careful that I don't combine things because they
look the same under some assumption that I hold.
>Also, I lost the point of the list of idiom examples: idiom B and idiom
>P are shown to be the same (modulo prefix). Have I missed something?
No, you didn't miss anything. I didn't merge them (yet) in case some
idiomatic differences between B and P emerge in subsequent discussions. I
think there might be some more complex combinations of statements that
don't work in the same way under those proposals.
#g
--------------------------
__
/\ \ Graham Klyne
/ \ \ (GK@ACM.ORG)
/ /\ \ \
/ / /\ \ \
/ / /__\_\ \
/ / /________\
\/___________/
Received on Thursday, 17 January 2002 17:50:22 UTC