W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > January 2002

Re: Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com, patrick.stickler@nokia.com, jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com, jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 15:30:20 +0100
To: phayes@ai.uwf.edu
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <OFE677EC5A.8BDE4007-ONC1256B51.00310536@bayer-ag.com>
[what a subject to discuss...]


[about http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/users/phayes/w3-rdf-mt-draft-J.html]

If XL is really a *global* mapping I assume that
each literal node is mapped into *one-and-ony-one* literal value
or have I misunderstood global?
then I don't see why
.. A literal node is a particular occurrence of a literal
.. literal nodes are unique to each graph.
.. several occurrences of a literal produce several rectangles with the same
.. literal nodes are not 'merged' in this way

I think that the most convenient global mapping is
  XL(literal-as-simple-name) = literal-as-simple-name
i.e. the identity mapping

Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2002 09:50:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:08 UTC