- From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 15:30:20 +0100
- To: phayes@ai.uwf.edu
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
[what a subject to discuss...] Pat, [about http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/users/phayes/w3-rdf-mt-draft-J.html] If XL is really a *global* mapping I assume that each literal node is mapped into *one-and-ony-one* literal value or have I misunderstood global? then I don't see why .. A literal node is a particular occurrence of a literal .. literal nodes are unique to each graph. .. several occurrences of a literal produce several rectangles with the same label .. literal nodes are not 'merged' in this way I think that the most convenient global mapping is XL(literal-as-simple-name) = literal-as-simple-name i.e. the identity mapping -- Jos
Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2002 09:50:12 UTC