w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from January 2002 by subject

Action 2002-01-11#3 reification issue

ACTION 2002-01-11#5 done

ACTION re: Review test cases on para 196

ACTION: 2002-01-11#9, done

Actions 2002-01-18#7, 2002-01-18#8

Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-11

Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-18

Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-25

Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-31

Agenda items for the f2f

And another nit (http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/users/phayes/w3-rdf-mt-draft-J.html)

apologies for 2002-01-18 telecon

call for agenda items

Can't live with S and tidy graphs

Can't live with TDL and untidy literals

cannot work with reification proposal 1

Circumstance, provenance and partial knowledge

Clarification about recent terminology

Co-existence

Comments/questions on latest draft of Sergey's Datatyping spec

Datatypes and xml:lang

Datatypes: forming an opinion

Datatypes: the Bermuda Triangle, and how to fly over it.

Datatyping desiderata (take 4) without embedded CSS

Datatyping desiderata - take 3

Datatyping desiderata, take 2

Datatyping desiderata, take 4

Datatyping differences

Datatyping Document Partitioning

Datatyping MT agreement

Datatyping Summary

Datatyping Summary - test suite, 2nd attempt

Datatyping Summary V2

Datatyping Summary V3

Datatyping: questions about TDL proposal

Datatyping: revised draft

DATATYPING: second draft

Diagrams for PDU "Pairing" Data Type Model and Interpretation of P/P+/D/U idioms

Diagrams for PDU Interpretation of S/A and S/B idioms

Diagrams showing Cohabitation of P and D Idioms per PD Model

direct CVS access to W3C site

Extracted/Tweaked Datatyping "foundation" document

Final draft of TDL proposal

For untidiness ...

Fwd: Re: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion

Fwd: Reminder: Jan 10: W3C I18N Workshop deadline

Fwd: TAG issues during technical plenary

Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com, patrick.stickler@nokia.com, jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com, jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/users/phayes/w3-rdf-mt-draft-J.html

Implementing S

ISSUE http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#mime-types-for-rdf-docs

ISSUE http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-nested-bagIDs

ISSUE http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-qname-uri-mapping

ISSUE http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-reification-required

ISSUE http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-replace-value

ISSUE http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-xml-base

Issue mime-types-for-rdf-docs

Joint Committee response regarding datatyping

literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT)

Missing messages

Model Theory draft + tidiness

Model theory update (was: Re: Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com, patrick.stickler@nokia.com, jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com, jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com)

Modeling untidiness in tidy graphs

Monotonicity

MT containing containers

No model theory for reification?

not-id-and-resource-attr

not-id-and-resource-attr & bagID

On the elegance of P/P+

Preview of working draft for TLD (PD) datatyping scheme proposal

Primer - some comments

primer update

Problem with TDL

Problem with TDL (NOT)

Proposals? Re: use/mention and reification

Question about "cohabitation" of S idioms A and B

Question about S

RDF "data model" (was comments on syntax draft)

RDF Core telecon 2002-01-11 draft minutes

RDF datatyping

RDF datatyping goals (action from teleconference)

RDF Issue #rdfms-qname-uri-mapping

rdf-ns-prefix-confusion

RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-01-24

rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr

Re(buttal): Why I cannot live with S

relating S-A and S-B [was: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement]

Retract test suite message

review MT draft

Review of 14-Dec-2001 RDF model theory document

Review of MT

Revised MT document

TAG issues during technical plenary

TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement

TDL is compatible with tidy literals, even if current TDL MT is not (which should be fixed)

TDL Model Theory

Telecon 2002-01-18 minutes

Test cases for proposal: unrecognized attributes in the xml namespace should be ignored.

Thoughts on Reification: was: Re: Proposals? Re: use/mention and reification

Tidy literal nodes incompatable with current MT?

update to MT document

US spelling serialization (sic)

use/mention and reification

weekly call for agenda items

Why I cannot live with S

xml:base testcase draft: base and embedded hyperlink interactions

Last message date: Thursday, 31 January 2002 20:32:00 UTC