public-html@w3.org from January 2010 by author

Adam Barth

Comparison between <sandbox> and @sandbox (Thursday, 28 January)
Re: over specification is anti-competitive (blog post) (Thursday, 28 January)
Re: What defines a "plugin"? WRT sandboxing? (Tuesday, 26 January)
Re: What defines a "plugin"? WRT sandboxing? (Tuesday, 26 January)
Re: What defines a "plugin"? WRT sandboxing? (Tuesday, 26 January)
Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing (Tuesday, 26 January)
Re: What defines a "plugin"? WRT sandboxing? (Tuesday, 26 January)
Re: What defines a "plugin"? WRT sandboxing? (Tuesday, 26 January)
Re: What defines a "plugin"? WRT sandboxing? (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: What defines a "plugin"? WRT sandboxing? (Monday, 25 January)
Re: What defines a "plugin"? WRT sandboxing? (Monday, 25 January)
Re: What defines a "plugin"? WRT sandboxing? (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: IRI working group approved by IETF, call for volunteers for co-chair with W3C/IETF experience (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: <iframe> operation (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: FYI: review of draft-abarth-mime-sniff-03 (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: FYI: review of draft-abarth-mime-sniff-03 (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Disallow plug-ins in text/html-sandboxed? (was: Re: text/sandboxed-html) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: text/sandboxed-html (Monday, 18 January)
Re: text/sandboxed-html (Monday, 18 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 18 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 18 January)
Re: Costs and Benefits of Early Implementations (was Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs) (Monday, 18 January)
Re: XSS risk from iframe@doc? (Monday, 18 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 18 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 17 January)
XSS risk from iframe@doc? (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: Disallow plug-ins in text/html-sandboxed? (was: Re: text/sandboxed-html) (Wednesday, 13 January)
Disallow plug-ins in text/html-sandboxed? (was: Re: text/sandboxed-html) (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: text/sandboxed-html (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: text/sandboxed-html (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: Updated DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Friday, 8 January)
Re: "Controlled environments" in scope for HTML working group (Monday, 4 January)
Re: Updated DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Sunday, 3 January)
Re: "Controlled environments" in scope for HTML working group (Sunday, 3 January)
Re: "vastly increases reverse-engineering costs" and version proposal (Sunday, 3 January)

Adrian Bateman

RE: INVALID_STATE_ERR or INVALID_ACCESS_ERR when attempting to write into XML documents (Friday, 22 January)
INVALID_STATE_ERR or INVALID_ACCESS_ERR when attempting to write into XML documents (Thursday, 21 January)
RE: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Thursday, 21 January)
RE: Fieldset disabled attribute and descendants (Thursday, 21 January)
RE: Fieldset disabled attribute and descendants (Monday, 18 January)
Fieldset disabled attribute and descendants (Wednesday, 13 January)
RE: The Canvas 2D API split (Monday, 11 January)

Anne van Kesteren

Re: Browser implementations, prior to rec, used for justification (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Tuesday, 5 January)

Aryeh Gregor

Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: Request for group input on ISSUE-83 (figure and details captions) (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: Request for group input on ISSUE-83 (figure and details captions) (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Request for group input on ISSUE-83 (figure and details captions) (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Monday, 18 January)
Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41) (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41) (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41) (Friday, 15 January)
Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Friday, 15 January)
Re: Alternate proposals for ISSUE-83 (Friday, 15 January)
Re: Alternate proposals for ISSUE-83 (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Tuesday, 12 January)
Re: New split-out drafts vs. modular design (Monday, 11 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Sunday, 10 January)
Re: Taking another round at @summary (Friday, 8 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Friday, 8 January)
Re: Taking another round at @summary (Friday, 8 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Monday, 4 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Sunday, 3 January)
Re: HTML5 Recommendation document review comments (Sunday, 3 January)

Benjamin Nowack

Re: Suggestion for Microdata to RDF conversion (Thursday, 28 January)
Re: Suggestion for Microdata to RDF conversion (Monday, 25 January)
Re: Suggestion for Microdata to RDF conversion (Monday, 25 January)
Re: Suggestion for Microdata to RDF conversion (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Suggestion for Microdata to RDF conversion (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Suggestion for Microdata to RDF conversion (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Suggestion for Microdata to RDF conversion (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Suggestion for Microdata to RDF conversion (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Suggestion for Microdata to RDF conversion (Thursday, 21 January)
Suggestion for Microdata to RDF conversion (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Monday, 11 January)

Benoit Piette

Re: splits, discussions, and manic behavior (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: splits, discussions, and manic behavior (Saturday, 9 January)

Boris Zbarsky

Re: spec verbosity and algorithms (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 18 January)
Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Monday, 18 January)
Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Saturday, 16 January)
Re: hidden versus discoverable meta-data (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: text/sandboxed-html (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: text/sandboxed-html (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: New split-out drafts vs. modular design (Sunday, 10 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Sunday, 10 January)
Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Monday, 4 January)
Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Friday, 1 January)

Bruce Lawson

Re: Alternate proposals for ISSUE-83 (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: Work on Alternate Proposals for ISSUE-83 dt-dd-semantics (Tuesday, 12 January)
Re: Work on Alternate Proposals for ISSUE-83 dt-dd-semantics (Monday, 11 January)

bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

[Bug 5821] meta/@scheme missing (Thursday, 28 January)
[Bug 8088] Change back the meaning of <meta http-equiv="Content-Language" content="FOO, BAR"> (Thursday, 28 January)
[Bug 8003] line breaks in attributes (especially title) (Thursday, 28 January)
[Bug 8000] ARIA roles added to the a element should be conforming in HTML5 (Thursday, 28 January)
[Bug 8818] Remove the srcdoc attribute (Tuesday, 26 January)
[Bug 8736] Decision to playback for media should be left to the user agent (Friday, 15 January)
[Bug 8659] Media events to indicate captions and audio descriptions (Friday, 15 January)
[Bug 8658] Availability of captions or additional audio tracks (Friday, 15 January)
[Bug 8657] Allow UA to reload fallback content if it fails to load (Friday, 15 January)
[Bug 8187] Section 4.8.7 on video makes no reference to audio description (Friday, 15 January)
[Bug 5758] insufficient accessibility fallback for <audio> or <video> (Friday, 15 January)
[Bug 8404] Refocus the figure element back to being a figure (Wednesday, 13 January)
[Bug 8449] Remove extraneous material from Table section (Wednesday, 13 January)
[Bug 8379] Remove Section 4.11.1 The Details Element (Wednesday, 13 January)
[Bug 8331] Move the Canvas 2D context API into a separate spec (Monday, 11 January)
[Bug 8331] Move the Canvas 2D context API into a separate spec (Monday, 11 January)
[Bug 8555] Remove the Meter Element (Monday, 11 January)
[Bug 8552] Remove the Progress Element (Monday, 11 January)
[Bug 8118] Remove the Hidden Attribute (Monday, 11 January)
[Bug 7386] SharedWorkerGlobalScope (Monday, 11 January)
[Bug 8365] Remove the Web Browsers Section 5 (Saturday, 9 January)
[Bug 8379] Remove Section 4.11.1 The Details Element (Friday, 8 January)
[Bug 8449] Remove extraneous material from Table section (Friday, 8 January)
[Bug 8447] Tighter definition on the aside element (Friday, 8 January)
[Bug 8404] Refocus the figure element back to being a figure (Friday, 8 January)
[Bug 8401] Remove section 4.12 regarding idioms (Friday, 8 January)
[Bug 8449] Remove extraneous material from Table section (Friday, 8 January)
[Bug 8447] Tighter definition on the aside element (Friday, 8 January)
[Bug 8404] Refocus the figure element back to being a figure (Friday, 8 January)
[Bug 8401] Remove section 4.12 regarding idioms (Friday, 8 January)
[Bug 7510] Allow elements beyond just HTML, MathML, and SVG into SVG element (Friday, 8 January)
[Bug 7542] Remove Section 5. Microdata (Thursday, 7 January)
[Bug 8671] Requiring the label attribute (Thursday, 7 January)
[Bug 8674] Add popup as a value for the type attribute for menu element (Thursday, 7 January)
[Bug 8246] what about IE parsing problems? http://html5doctor.com/dd-details-wrong-again/ (Tuesday, 5 January)
[Bug 8118] Remove the Hidden Attribute (Monday, 4 January)
[Bug 8623] Graceful degradation when using the style element (Monday, 4 January)
[Bug 8622] Activation behaviour and pre-click activation (Monday, 4 January)
[Bug 8621] Orphan nodes in content models (Monday, 4 January)
[Bug 8620] No concept of interoperability beyond the site (Monday, 4 January)
[Bug 8619] Problematic for assistive technologies (Monday, 4 January)
[Bug 8617] Purpose of the icon attribute (Monday, 4 January)
[Bug 8611] Consider adding a full schema to H:TML (Monday, 4 January)

Carlos Cardona

Re: HTML WG F2F meeting (Wednesday, 27 January)
Thanks Maciej! (Monday, 11 January)
Re: New split-out drafts (Sunday, 10 January)

Charles McCathieNevile

Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Sunday, 24 January)

Chris Double

Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Monday, 4 January)
Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Monday, 4 January)
Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Monday, 4 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Monday, 4 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Sunday, 3 January)

Dan Brickley

Re: Dublin Core review of HTML5 (Thursday, 14 January)

David Carlisle

Re: ISSUE-87: attr-normalization - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Monday, 4 January)
Re: polyglot XHTML/HTML and <!DOCTYPE html about:legacy-compat> (Saturday, 2 January)

David Orchard

Invitation to connect on LinkedIn (Thursday, 21 January)

David Singer

Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Understanding the "applicable specifications" clause (was: Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41)) (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Change Proposals and Counter-Proposals (was Re: Issues 89 through 97) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Monday, 18 January)
Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Saturday, 16 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: Taking another round at @summary (Wednesday, 6 January)

Denis Boudreau

Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Monday, 11 January)
Re: Taking another round at @summary (Wednesday, 6 January)
Re: Taking another round at @summary (Wednesday, 6 January)
Re: Taking another round at @summary (Wednesday, 6 January)
Re: Taking another round at @summary (Wednesday, 6 January)
Re: Taking another round at @summary (Wednesday, 6 January)
Re: Taking another round at @summary (Wednesday, 6 January)
Re: Taking another round at @summary (Wednesday, 6 January)
Re: Taking another round at @summary (Wednesday, 6 January)
Re: Taking another round at @summary (Wednesday, 6 January)
Re: Taking another round at @summary (Tuesday, 5 January)
Taking another round at @summary (Tuesday, 5 January)
Taking another round at @summary (Tuesday, 5 January)

Devdatta

Re: text/sandboxed-html (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: text/sandboxed-html (Wednesday, 13 January)

Don Brutzman

Re: HTML5 Recommendation Additions for Integrating X3D Graphics (Wednesday, 6 January)
HTML5 Recommendation Additions for Integrating X3D Graphics (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: HTML5 Recommendation document review comments (Monday, 4 January)
Re: HTML5 Recommendation document review comments (Sunday, 3 January)
HTML5 Recommendation document review comments (Sunday, 3 January)

Doug Schepers

Re: <iframe doc=""> (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: The Canvas 2D API split (Monday, 11 January)

Dr. Olaf Hoffmann

Re: Understanding the "applicable specifications" clause (was: Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41)) (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Understanding the "applicable specifications" clause (was: Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41)) (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: draft HTML5: Techniques for the provision of text alternatives (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Decentralized poetry markup (language) (ISSUE-41) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Understanding the "applicable specifications" clause (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Decentralized poetry markup (language) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Decentralized poetry markup (language) (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: draft HTML5: Techniques for the provision of text alternatives (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: draft HTML5: Techniques for the provision of text alternatives (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: draft HTML5: Techniques for the provision of text alternatives (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: draft HTML5: Techniques for the provision of text alternatives (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: draft HTML5: Techniques for the provision of text alternatives (Monday, 18 January)

Edward O'Connor

Re: <iframe doc=""> (Saturday, 16 January)
Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Friday, 8 January)

Eliot Graff

RE: The Canvas 2D API split (Tuesday, 12 January)

Ennals, Robert

RE: HTML WG F2F meeting (Wednesday, 27 January)
RE: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Friday, 8 January)

Eric Carlson

Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Sunday, 10 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Friday, 8 January)
Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Monday, 4 January)

Felix Sasaki

Re: ITS in html Re: HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Draft publishing request (Friday, 15 January)

Frank Olivier

RE: Canvas Accessibility Next steps (Friday, 22 January)
RE: Canvas Accessibility Next steps (Friday, 22 January)

Gavin Carothers

Re: Trying to use <iframe srcdoc= > (Monday, 25 January)
Re: Trying to use <iframe srcdoc= > (Monday, 25 January)
Re: Trying to use <iframe srcdoc= > (Monday, 25 January)
Trying to use <iframe srcdoc= > (Monday, 25 January)

gaz Heyes

Re: text/sandboxed-html (Wednesday, 13 January)

Geoffrey Sneddon

Re: New split-out drafts (Monday, 11 January)

Graham Klyne

Re: Suggestion for Microdata to RDF conversion (Friday, 22 January)
Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: text/sandboxed-html (Wednesday, 13 January)

Gregory J. Rosmaita

wiki pages for CANVAS accessibility meetings & minutes (Monday, 25 January)
hidden versus discoverable meta-data (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: [Bug 8671] Requiring the label attribute (Thursday, 7 January)
Re: Taking another round at @summary (Wednesday, 6 January)

Helen Wang (MSR)

RE: Comparison between <sandbox> and @sandbox (Friday, 29 January)
RE: Comparison between <sandbox> and @sandbox (Friday, 29 January)

Henri Sivonen

Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Monday, 25 January)
Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Friday, 22 January)
Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Friday, 22 January)
ACTION-138 ARIA matrix (was: Re: [VER 2] {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2010-01-21: AIs, CfC/CfPs, and heartbeat docs) (Friday, 22 January)
Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Understanding the "applicable specifications" clause (was: Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41)) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Understanding the "applicable specifications" clause (was: Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41)) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Decentralized poetry markup (language) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 18 January)
Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41) (Friday, 15 January)
Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Friday, 15 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Monday, 11 January)
Re: Taking another round at @summary (Wednesday, 6 January)
Re: [Bug 8611] Consider adding a full schema to H:TML (Wednesday, 6 January)
Re: Browser implementations, prior to rec, used for justification (Wednesday, 6 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Wednesday, 6 January)
Re: "Controlled environments" in scope for HTML working group (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: Browser implementations, prior to rec, used for justification (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: Browser implementations, prior to rec, used for justification (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: Browser implementations, prior to rec, used for justification (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: Browser implementations, prior to rec, used for justification (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Monday, 4 January)
Re: polyglot XHTML/HTML and <!DOCTYPE html about:legacy-compat> (Monday, 4 January)

Henry S. Thompson

Re: polyglot XHTML/HTML and <!DOCTYPE html about:legacy-compat> (Friday, 8 January)

Ian Hickson

Re: Next issues to move forward on (Saturday, 30 January)
Re: New round of Working Drafts (was Re: New split-out drafts) (Friday, 29 January)
Re: Microdata to RDF conversion (Friday, 29 January)
Re: Suggestion for Microdata to RDF conversion (Thursday, 28 January)
Re: Suggestion for Microdata to RDF conversion (Thursday, 28 January)
Re: HTML WG F2F meeting (Wednesday, 27 January)
RE: HTML WG F2F meeting (Wednesday, 27 January)
Re: HTML WG F2F meeting (Tuesday, 26 January)
RE: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: Request for group input on ISSUE-83 (figure and details captions) (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Saturday, 23 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Saturday, 23 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Friday, 22 January)
Re: spec verbosity and algorithms (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Suggestion for Microdata to RDF conversion (Friday, 22 January)
RE: INVALID_STATE_ERR or INVALID_ACCESS_ERR when attempting to write into XML documents (Friday, 22 January)
Re: INVALID_STATE_ERR or INVALID_ACCESS_ERR when attempting to write into XML documents (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Disallow plug-ins in text/html-sandboxed? (was: Re: text/sandboxed-html) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Disallow plug-ins in text/html-sandboxed? (was: Re: text/sandboxed-html) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Disallow plug-ins in text/html-sandboxed? (was: Re: text/sandboxed-html) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: Microdata to RDF conversion (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Tuesday, 19 January)
Inadequate rationales (Was: Change Proposals and Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 18 January)
Re: XSS risk from iframe@doc? (Monday, 18 January)
Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Monday, 18 January)
Re: XSS risk from iframe@doc? (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: XSS risk from iframe@doc? (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: XSS risk from iframe@doc? (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Saturday, 16 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Friday, 15 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Friday, 15 January)
Re: Alternate proposals for ISSUE-83 (Friday, 15 January)
Re: Alternate proposals for ISSUE-83 (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: Alternate proposals for ISSUE-83 (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: Fieldset disabled attribute and descendants (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: text/sandboxed-html (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: text/sandboxed-html (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Wednesday, 13 January)
<iframe doc=""> (Wednesday, 13 January)
text/sandboxed-html (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: Fw: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Tuesday, 12 January)
Re: New split-out drafts (Tuesday, 12 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Tuesday, 12 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Tuesday, 12 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Tuesday, 12 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Tuesday, 12 January)
Re: Fw: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Sunday, 10 January)
Re: splits, discussions, and manic behavior (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: New split-out drafts (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: New split-out drafts (Saturday, 9 January)
New split-out drafts (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: Fw: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Friday, 8 January)
Re: Fw: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Friday, 8 January)
Re: ISSUE-93 (details): Return Details Element [HTML 5 spec] (Friday, 8 January)
Re: Fw: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Friday, 8 January)
Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-76 Microdata/RDFa (Friday, 8 January)
Re: [Bug 8611] Consider adding a full schema to H:TML (Wednesday, 6 January)
Re: [Bug 8611] Consider adding a full schema to H:TML (Wednesday, 6 January)
Re: Taking another round at @summary (Tuesday, 5 January)
RE: Browser implementations, prior to rec, used for justification (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: aged bugs (Monday, 4 January)
Re: "Controlled environments" in scope for HTML working group (Sunday, 3 January)

Ian Jacobs

Call for Exclusions (Update): HTML+RDFa (Thursday, 14 January)

James Craig

Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Canvas Accessibility Next steps (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Canvas Accessibility Next steps (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Canvas Accessibility Next steps (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Canvas Accessibility Next steps (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Thursday, 14 January)

James Graham

Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: Alternate proposals for ISSUE-83 (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: New split-out drafts (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: Browser implementations, prior to rec, used for justification (Wednesday, 6 January)

Jeremy Keith

Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Friday, 8 January)
Re: Taking another round at @summary (Friday, 8 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Thursday, 7 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Thursday, 7 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Sunday, 3 January)

Jirka Kosek

Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Friday, 8 January)
Re: polyglot XHTML/HTML and <!DOCTYPE html about:legacy-compat> (Sunday, 3 January)
Re: polyglot XHTML/HTML and <!DOCTYPE html about:legacy-compat> (Saturday, 2 January)

Joe D Williams

Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals - off topic object (Saturday, 30 January)
Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Saturday, 30 January)
Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals - off topic object (Saturday, 30 January)
Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Friday, 29 January)
Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Friday, 29 January)
Re: What defines a "plugin"? WRT sandboxing? (Thursday, 28 January)
Re: What defines a "plugin"? WRT sandboxing? (Wednesday, 27 January)
Re: What defines a "plugin"? WRT sandboxing? (Wednesday, 27 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Tuesday, 26 January)
Re: <iframe> operation (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: <iframe> operation (Sunday, 24 January)
<iframe> operation (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Saturday, 23 January)
Re: Canvas Accessibility Next steps (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Canvas Accessibility Next steps (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Canvas Accessibility Next steps (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: text/sandboxed-html (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 18 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 18 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 18 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 18 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 18 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41) (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Friday, 15 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: hidden versus discoverable meta-data (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: New split-out drafts vs. modular design (Sunday, 10 January)
Re: Fw: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Sunday, 10 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: [Bug 8611] Consider adding a full schema to H:TML (Wednesday, 6 January)
Re: [Bug 8611] Consider adding a full schema to H:TML (Wednesday, 6 January)
Re: [Bug 8611] Consider adding a full schema to H:TML (Tuesday, 5 January)

John A. Stewart

FYI for minutes: irc - [18:05] <Zakim> + +1.613.998.aabb (Thursday, 21 January)

John Foliot

RE: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Sunday, 24 January)
RE: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Saturday, 23 January)
RE: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Friday, 22 January)
RE: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Friday, 22 January)
RE: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Thursday, 21 January)
RE: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Sunday, 17 January)
RE: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Sunday, 17 January)
RE: hidden versus discoverable meta-data (Thursday, 14 January)
RE: hidden versus discoverable meta-data (Thursday, 14 January)
RE: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Friday, 8 January)
RE: Taking another round at @summary (Friday, 8 January)
RE: Taking another round at @summary (Wednesday, 6 January)
RE: Taking another round at @summary (Wednesday, 6 January)
RE: Taking another round at @summary (Wednesday, 6 January)
RE: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Friday, 1 January)

Jon Gunderson

Re: Canvas Accessibility Next steps (Friday, 22 January)
Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Friday, 15 January)
Proposed accessible name and description calculations for TABLE markup (Thursday, 7 January)

Jonas Sicking

Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Friday, 29 January)
Re: <summary> not for table (was Re: Next issues to move forward on) (Thursday, 28 January)
Re: Next issues to move forward on (Thursday, 28 January)
Re: Request for group input on ISSUE-83 (figure and details captions) (Tuesday, 26 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Saturday, 23 January)
Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Saturday, 23 January)
Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Disallow plug-ins in text/html-sandboxed? (was: Re: text/sandboxed-html) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Decentralized poetry markup (language) (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: Decentralized poetry markup (language) (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Friday, 15 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Friday, 15 January)
Re: Alternate proposals for ISSUE-83 (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Draft publishing request (Tuesday, 12 January)
Re: New split-out drafts vs. modular design (Sunday, 10 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: ISSUE-93 (details): Return Details Element [HTML 5 spec] (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: New split-out drafts (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: New split-out drafts (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: New split-out drafts (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: remove the meter element (Friday, 8 January)
Re: remove the meter element (Friday, 8 January)
Re: ISSUE-93 (details): Return Details Element [HTML 5 spec] (Friday, 8 January)
Re: ISSUE-93 (details): Return Details Element [HTML 5 spec] (Friday, 8 January)
Re: sections removed, current and ongoing (Friday, 8 January)
Re: ISSUE-93 (details): Return Details Element [HTML 5 spec] (Friday, 8 January)
Re: sections removed, current and ongoing (Friday, 8 January)
Re: sections removed, current and ongoing (Friday, 8 January)
Re: sections removed, current and ongoing (Friday, 8 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Friday, 8 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Friday, 8 January)
Re: Fw: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Thursday, 7 January)
Re: Taking another round at @summary (Wednesday, 6 January)
Re: Taking another round at @summary (Wednesday, 6 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Wednesday, 6 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Wednesday, 6 January)
Re: Taking another round at @summary (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: Taking another round at @summary (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: Browser implementations, prior to rec, used for justification (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: Browser implementations, prior to rec, used for justification (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: Browser implementations, prior to rec, used for justification (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Sunday, 3 January)
Re: polyglot XHTML/HTML and <!DOCTYPE html about:legacy-compat> (Sunday, 3 January)

Joshue O Connor

Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Taking another round at @summary (Tuesday, 5 January)

Julian Reschke

Re: New round of Working Drafts (was Re: New split-out drafts) (Saturday, 30 January)
Re: Pending tracker issues (Thursday, 28 January)
Re: What defines a "plugin"? WRT sandboxing? (Wednesday, 27 January)
Re: HTML WG F2F meeting (Wednesday, 27 January)
Re: What defines a "plugin"? WRT sandboxing? (Tuesday, 26 January)
Re: removing the srcdoc (Tuesday, 26 January)
Re: removing the srcdoc (Tuesday, 26 January)
Re: removing the srcdoc (Tuesday, 26 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: What defines a "plugin"? WRT sandboxing? (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: spec verbosity and algorithms (Saturday, 23 January)
Re: spec verbosity and algorithms (Friday, 22 January)
spec verbosity and algorithms (Friday, 22 January)
Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Friday, 22 January)
Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Friday, 22 January)
Re: ACTION-103 Follow up on the about: scheme Registration (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Registries, meta/name=keyword, head/@profile (ISSUE-27, ISSUE-55 and ISSUE-79) (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: FYI: review of draft-abarth-mime-sniff-03 (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: text/sandboxed-html (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Monday, 18 January)
Re: text/sandboxed-html (Monday, 18 January)
Re: text/sandboxed-html (Monday, 18 January)
[Fwd: 2047 in 2388: encoded words in multipart/form-data] (Monday, 18 January)
Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41) (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: ISSUE-81: representation-vs-resource - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41) (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Saturday, 16 January)
Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41) (Saturday, 16 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Saturday, 16 January)
Re: text/sandboxed-html (Friday, 15 January)
Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41) (Friday, 15 January)
Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41) (Friday, 15 January)
Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41) (Friday, 15 January)
Re: text/sandboxed-html (Friday, 15 January)
Re: text/sandboxed-html (Friday, 15 January)
Re: Dublin Core review of HTML5 (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: Dublin Core review of HTML5 (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: ISSUE-79: meta-keywords - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Draft publishing request (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: CHANGE PROPOSAL: Remove ping and hyperlink auditing (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2) (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Draft publishing request (Wednesday, 13 January)
Registries, meta/name=keyword, head/@profile (ISSUE-27, ISSUE-55 and ISSUE-79) (Tuesday, 12 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Tuesday, 12 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Monday, 11 January)
Re: New split-out drafts (Monday, 11 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Monday, 11 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Monday, 11 January)
Re: [Bug 8365] Remove the Web Browsers Section 5 (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: New split-out drafts (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Friday, 8 January)
Re: Removing Sections (Friday, 8 January)
Removing Sections (Friday, 8 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Friday, 8 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Friday, 8 January)
Re: Taking another round at @summary (Wednesday, 6 January)
Re: Taking another round at @summary (Wednesday, 6 January)
Re: Browser implementations, prior to rec, used for justification (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: Browser implementations, prior to rec, used for justification (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: "Controlled environments" in scope for HTML working group (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: Browser implementations, prior to rec, used for justification (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: Browser implementations, prior to rec, used for justification (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: "Controlled environments" in scope for HTML working group (Monday, 4 January)
Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Monday, 4 January)
Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Monday, 4 January)
Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Monday, 4 January)

Justin James

RE: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Sunday, 17 January)
RE: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Sunday, 17 January)

Karl Dubost

W3C document license Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Thursday, 28 January)
Re: spec verbosity and algorithms (Saturday, 23 January)
Re: spec verbosity and algorithms (Saturday, 23 January)
Re: spec verbosity and algorithms (Saturday, 23 January)
Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Saturday, 16 January)
Re: Issue 83 Change Proposal - caption attribute (Saturday, 16 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Saturday, 16 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Saturday, 16 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Saturday, 16 January)
Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Saturday, 16 January)
Re: hidden versus discoverable meta-data (Friday, 15 January)
Re: Issue 83 Change Proposal - caption attribute (Friday, 15 January)
ITS in html Re: HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Draft publishing request (Friday, 15 January)
Re: New split-out drafts (Sunday, 10 January)
Re: Taking another round at @summary (Thursday, 7 January)
Re: Taking another round at @summary (Wednesday, 6 January)

Kelly Ford

RE: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Thursday, 21 January)
RE: Taking another round at @summary (Thursday, 7 January)

Kornel

Re: removing the srcdoc (Tuesday, 26 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Friday, 15 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Friday, 8 January)

Kornel Lesinski

Re: [whatwg] some thoughts on sandboxed IFRAMEs (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)

Krzysztof Maczyński

Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Friday, 29 January)
Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Friday, 29 January)
Re: spec verbosity and algorithms (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Friday, 22 January)
(not really) Re: Alternate proposals for ISSUE-83 (Friday, 15 January)
Publishing HTML+RDFa WD (Wednesday, 13 January)
details should be a child (Sunday, 10 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Friday, 8 January)

L. David Baron

Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Monday, 18 January)
Re: "vastly increases reverse-engineering costs" and version proposal (Monday, 4 January)

Lachlan Hunt

Re: Request for group input on ISSUE-83 (figure and details captions) (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Request for group input on ISSUE-83 (figure and details captions) (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Understanding the "applicable specifications" clause (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Understanding the "applicable specifications" clause (was: Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41)) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Legacy Doctype and Doctype Versioning (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Issues 89 through 97 (Monday, 18 January)
Re: XSS risk from iframe@doc? (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: text/sandboxed-html (Friday, 15 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Monday, 11 January)
Re: New split-out drafts vs. modular design (Monday, 11 January)
Re: New split-out drafts (Sunday, 10 January)
Re: New split-out drafts vs. modular design (Sunday, 10 January)
Re: sections removed, current and ongoing (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: sections removed, current and ongoing (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: Taking another round at @summary (Wednesday, 6 January)

Larry Masinter

RE: New round of Working Drafts (was Re: New split-out drafts) (Friday, 29 January)
Re: HTML WG F2F meeting (Thursday, 28 January)
would like more time on ACTION-172 (ISSUE-4 and ISSUE-84) (Wednesday, 27 January)
over specification is anti-competitive (blog post) (Wednesday, 27 January)
IRI working group approved by IETF, call for volunteers for co-chair with W3C/IETF experience (Sunday, 24 January)
RE: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Friday, 22 January)
RE: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Friday, 22 January)
RE: HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Draft publishing request (Thursday, 21 January)
FYI: review of draft-abarth-mime-sniff-03 (Wednesday, 20 January)
Legacy Doctype and Doctype Versioning (Wednesday, 20 January)
RE: Re: HTML CHANGE PROPOSAL; change definition of URL to normative reference to IRIBIS (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: HTML CHANGE PROPOSAL; change definition of URL to normative reference to IRIBIS (Tuesday, 19 January)
RE: Change Proposals and Counter-Proposals (was Re: Issues 89 through 97) (Tuesday, 19 January)
RE: ISSUE-81: representation-vs-resource - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Monday, 18 January)
RE: {agenda} HTML WG telecon 2010-01-07 (Thursday, 14 January)
Dublin Core review of HTML5 (Thursday, 14 January)
charter and votes to publish documents (Wednesday, 13 January)
RE: HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Draft publishing request (Wednesday, 13 January)
RE: New split-out drafts vs. modular design (Sunday, 10 January)
RE: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Saturday, 9 January)
RE: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Friday, 8 January)
RE: Updated DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Friday, 8 January)
obsoleting and the text/html MIME type (re Taking another round at @summary) (Thursday, 7 January)
Updated DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Sunday, 3 January)
"Controlled environments" in scope for HTML working group (Saturday, 2 January)
RE: polyglot XHTML/HTML and <!DOCTYPE html about:legacy-compat> (Saturday, 2 January)
"vastly increases reverse-engineering costs" and version proposal (Saturday, 2 January)
polyglot XHTML/HTML and <!DOCTYPE html about:legacy-compat> (Saturday, 2 January)

Lars Gunther

Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: Request for group input on ISSUE-83 (figure and details captions) (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: New split-out drafts vs. modular design (Monday, 11 January)

Laura Carlson

Re: <summary> not for table (was Re: Next issues to move forward on) (Thursday, 28 January)
<summary> not for table (was Re: Next issues to move forward on) (Thursday, 28 January)
Re: <summary> element and Issue 32 (Sunday, 24 January)
<summary> element and Issue 32 (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: draft HTML5: Techniques for the provision of text alternatives (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Change Proposals and Counter-Proposals (was Re: Issues 89 through 97) (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: draft HTML5: Techniques for the provision of text alternatives (Monday, 18 January)
Re: splits, discussions, and manic behavior (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: splits, discussions, and manic behavior (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: splits, discussions, and manic behavior (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: sections removed, current and ongoing (Friday, 8 January)
Re: sections removed, current and ongoing (Friday, 8 January)
Re: aged bugs (Monday, 4 January)
Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-35 aria-processing (ends 2009-12-17) (Monday, 4 January)

Leif Halvard Silli

Re: Understanding the "applicable specifications" clause (was: Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41)) (Sunday, 31 January)
Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals - off topic object (Sunday, 31 January)
Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals - off topic object (Saturday, 30 January)
Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Saturday, 30 January)
Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Saturday, 30 January)
Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Friday, 29 January)
Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Friday, 29 January)
Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Friday, 29 January)
Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Friday, 29 January)
Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Friday, 29 January)
Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Friday, 29 January)
Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Friday, 29 January)
Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Friday, 29 January)
Re: Request for group input on ISSUE-83 (figure and details captions) (Tuesday, 26 January)
Re: Request for group input on ISSUE-83 (figure and details captions) (Tuesday, 26 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: Request for group input on ISSUE-83 (figure and details captions) (Monday, 25 January)
Re: Request for group input on ISSUE-83 (figure and details captions) (Monday, 25 January)
Re: Understanding the "applicable specifications" clause (was: Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41)) (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Understanding the "applicable specifications" clause (was: Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41)) (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Understanding the "applicable specifications" clause (was: Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41)) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: XHTML Syntax Served as text/html (Was: Decentralized poetry markup (language)) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Understanding the "applicable specifications" clause (was: Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41)) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: XHTML Syntax Served as text/html (Was: Decentralized poetry markup (language)) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Understanding the "applicable specifications" clause (was: Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41)) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Decentralized poetry markup (language) (ISSUE-41) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Understanding the "applicable specifications" clause (was: Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41)) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Understanding the "applicable specifications" clause (was: Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41)) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Decentralized poetry markup (language) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Decentralized poetry markup (language) (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: Decentralized poetry markup (language) (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41) (Tuesday, 19 January)
Decentralized poetry markup (language) (ISSUE-41) (Tuesday, 19 January)
Decentralized poetry markup (language) (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41) (Monday, 18 January)
Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41) (Monday, 18 January)
Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Sunday, 17 January)
@profile and HTML spec experimenting (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41) (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41) (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41) (Saturday, 16 January)
Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41) (Saturday, 16 January)
Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41) (Saturday, 16 January)
Re: hidden versus discoverable meta-data (Friday, 15 January)
Re: hidden versus discoverable meta-data (Friday, 15 January)
Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41) (Friday, 15 January)
Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41) (Friday, 15 January)
Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41) (Friday, 15 January)
Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41) (Friday, 15 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Friday, 15 January)
Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41) (Friday, 15 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Friday, 15 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Friday, 15 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Draft publishing request (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Draft publishing request (Tuesday, 12 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Tuesday, 12 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Tuesday, 12 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a (Tuesday, 12 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Tuesday, 12 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Tuesday, 12 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Monday, 11 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Monday, 11 January)
Re: New split-out drafts vs. modular design (Monday, 11 January)
Re: New split-out drafts vs. modular design (Monday, 11 January)
Re: New split-out drafts (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: New split-out drafts (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: Taking another round at @summary (Friday, 8 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Friday, 8 January)
Re: Taking another round at @summary (Friday, 8 January)
RE: Taking another round at @summary (Thursday, 7 January)
Re: Taking another round at @summary (Wednesday, 6 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Wednesday, 6 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: "Controlled environments" in scope for HTML working group (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: Browser implementations, prior to rec, used for justification (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Sunday, 3 January)

Leonard Rosenthol

RE: What defines a "plugin"? WRT sandboxing? (Wednesday, 27 January)
RE: What defines a "plugin"? WRT sandboxing? (Tuesday, 26 January)
RE: What defines a "plugin"? WRT sandboxing? (Tuesday, 26 January)
RE: What defines a "plugin"? WRT sandboxing? (Tuesday, 26 January)
RE: What defines a "plugin"? WRT sandboxing? (Tuesday, 26 January)
RE: What defines a "plugin"? WRT sandboxing? (Monday, 25 January)
RE: What defines a "plugin"? WRT sandboxing? (Sunday, 24 January)
RE: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 24 January)
RE: What defines a "plugin"? WRT sandboxing? (Sunday, 24 January)
RE: What defines a "plugin"? WRT sandboxing? (Sunday, 24 January)
RE: Disallow plug-ins in text/html-sandboxed? (was: Re: text/sandboxed-html) (Sunday, 24 January)
What defines a "plugin"? WRT sandboxing? (Sunday, 24 January)
RE: Disallow plug-ins in text/html-sandboxed? (was: Re: text/sandboxed-html) (Sunday, 24 January)
RE: Disallow plug-ins in text/html-sandboxed? (was: Re: text/sandboxed-html) (Wednesday, 13 January)
RE: text/sandboxed-html (Wednesday, 13 January)
RE: text/sandboxed-html (Wednesday, 13 January)
RE: <iframe doc=""> (Wednesday, 13 January)
RE: text/sandboxed-html (Wednesday, 13 January)

Maciej Stachowiak

Re: Next issues to move forward on (Saturday, 30 January)
Re: New round of Working Drafts (was Re: New split-out drafts) (Saturday, 30 January)
Re: New round of Working Drafts (was Re: New split-out drafts) (Saturday, 30 January)
Re: Pending tracker issues (Friday, 29 January)
Pending tracker issues (Thursday, 28 January)
Next issues to move forward on (Thursday, 28 January)
Extension granted on some Change Proposals (Thursday, 28 January)
Re: ISSUE-93 details - Call for Change Proposals (Thursday, 28 January)
Re: would like more time on ACTION-172 (ISSUE-4 and ISSUE-84) (Thursday, 28 January)
Re: HTML WG F2F meeting (Wednesday, 27 January)
Re: What defines a "plugin"? WRT sandboxing? (Tuesday, 26 January)
Re: Trying to use <iframe srcdoc= > (Tuesday, 26 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: What defines a "plugin"? WRT sandboxing? (Monday, 25 January)
Re: Request for group input on ISSUE-83 (figure and details captions) (Monday, 25 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Monday, 25 January)
Re: Canvas Accessibility Next steps (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: What defines a "plugin"? WRT sandboxing? (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: What defines a "plugin"? WRT sandboxing? (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: What defines a "plugin"? WRT sandboxing? (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: What defines a "plugin"? WRT sandboxing? (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: Disallow plug-ins in text/html-sandboxed? (was: Re: text/sandboxed-html) (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: Request for group input on ISSUE-83 (figure and details captions) (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: spec verbosity and algorithms (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: spec verbosity and algorithms (Saturday, 23 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Saturday, 23 January)
Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Saturday, 23 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Saturday, 23 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Saturday, 23 January)
Re: Canvas Accessibility Next steps (Saturday, 23 January)
Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Saturday, 23 January)
Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Friday, 22 January)
Re: ACTION-138 ARIA matrix (was: Re: [VER 2] {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2010-01-21: AIs, CfC/CfPs, and heartbeat docs) (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Friday, 22 January)
Re: ACTION-161 / ISSUE 88: Multiple content languages (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Request for group input on ISSUE-83 (figure and details captions) (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Request for group input on ISSUE-83 (figure and details captions) (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: ACTION-161 / ISSUE 88: Multiple content languages (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Request for group input on ISSUE-83 (figure and details captions) (Thursday, 21 January)
New round of Working Drafts (was Re: New split-out drafts) (Thursday, 21 January)
ISSUE-85 - anchor-roles - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Thursday, 21 January)
ISSUE-86 - atom-id-stability - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Thursday, 21 January)
ISSUE-82 - profile-disambiguation - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Thursday, 21 January)
ISSUE-55 - head-profile (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: HTML CHANGE PROPOSAL; change definition of URL to normative reference to IRIBIS (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Legacy Doctype and Doctype Versioning (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Legacy Doctype and Doctype Versioning (Thursday, 21 January)
Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: ISSUE-81: representation-vs-resource - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Thursday, 21 January)
ISSUE-27: rel-ownership Change Proposal discussion (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Disallow plug-ins in text/html-sandboxed? (was: Re: text/sandboxed-html) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Disallow plug-ins in text/html-sandboxed? (was: Re: text/sandboxed-html) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: text/sandboxed-html (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: Change Proposals and Counter-Proposals (was Re: Issues 89 through 97) (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: Inadequate rationales (Was: Change Proposals and Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: Change Proposals and Counter-Proposals (was Re: Issues 89 through 97) (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: Inadequate rationales (Was: Change Proposals and Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: ISSUE-81: representation-vs-resource - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: Change Proposals and Counter-Proposals (was Re: Issues 89 through 97) (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: Change Proposals and Counter-Proposals (was Re: Issues 89 through 97) (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: Change Proposals and Counter-Proposals (was Re: Issues 89 through 97) (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: text/sandboxed-html (Monday, 18 January)
Re: ISSUE-81: representation-vs-resource - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Monday, 18 January)
Change Proposals and Counter-Proposals (was Re: Issues 89 through 97) (Monday, 18 January)
Re: XSS risk from iframe@doc? (Monday, 18 January)
Costs and Benefits of Early Implementations (was Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs) (Monday, 18 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 18 January)
Re: Issues 89 through 97 (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: XSS risk from iframe@doc? (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: XSS risk from iframe@doc? (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: ISSUE-81: representation-vs-resource - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: Microdata to RDF conversion (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: Request for group input on ISSUE-83 (figure and details captions) (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Sunday, 17 January)
Request for group input on ISSUE-83 (figure and details captions) (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: Issues 89 through 97 (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: text/sandboxed-html (Friday, 15 January)
Re: text/sandboxed-html (Friday, 15 January)
Re: text/sandboxed-html (Friday, 15 January)
Re: Issues 89 through 97 (Friday, 15 January)
Re: (not really) Re: Alternate proposals for ISSUE-83 (Friday, 15 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Friday, 15 January)
Re: Alternate proposals for ISSUE-83 (Friday, 15 January)
Re: hidden versus discoverable meta-data (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: Alternate proposals for ISSUE-83 (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: Alternate proposals for ISSUE-83 (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: Alternate proposals for ISSUE-83 (Thursday, 14 January)
Alternate proposals for ISSUE-83 (Thursday, 14 January)
ISSUE-84 / ISSUE-4 Change Proposal (was Re: {agenda} HTML WG telecon 2010-01-07) (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2 - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: ISSUE-30: longdesc - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: Chairs Solicit Proposals for 89, 90, 91, 92, 95 **CORRECTION** (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: ISSUE-79: meta-keywords - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2 - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: ISSUE-83 alternate Change Proposal - fcaption and dlabel elements (or similar) (Wednesday, 13 January)
ISSUE-83 alternate Change Proposal - fcaption and dlabel elements (or similar) (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: text/sandboxed-html (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: charter and votes to publish documents (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: text/sandboxed-html (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: text/sandboxed-html (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: text/sandboxed-html (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Draft publishing request (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: CHANGE PROPOSAL: Remove ping and hyperlink auditing (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2) (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: Getting lots of out-of-process plugin hangs (Wednesday, 13 January)
Getting lots of out-of-process plugin hangs (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: text/sandboxed-html (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: text/sandboxed-html (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: ISSUE-81: representation-vs-resource - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: text/sandboxed-html (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Tuesday, 12 January)
Re: New split-out drafts (Tuesday, 12 January)
Re: HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Draft publishing request (Tuesday, 12 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Tuesday, 12 January)
Re: Registries, meta/name=keyword, head/@profile (ISSUE-27, ISSUE-55 and ISSUE-79) (Tuesday, 12 January)
Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-67 h:tml-parsing-dom - extended to 2010-01-07 (Tuesday, 12 January)
Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-59 normative-language-reference extended to 2010-01-07 (Tuesday, 12 January)
Re: ISSUE-74: canvas-accessibility - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Tuesday, 12 January)
Re: ISSUE-88: content-language-multiple - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Tuesday, 12 January)
Re: Work on Alternate Proposals for ISSUE-83 dt-dd-semantics (Tuesday, 12 January)
Re: Work on Alternate Proposals for ISSUE-83 dt-dd-semantics (Monday, 11 January)
Work on Alternate Proposals for ISSUE-83 dt-dd-semantics (Monday, 11 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Monday, 11 January)
Re: The Canvas 2D API split (Monday, 11 January)
Re: The Canvas 2D API split (Monday, 11 January)
Re: The Canvas 2D API split (Monday, 11 January)
Re: New split-out drafts vs. modular design (Monday, 11 January)
Re: New split-out drafts vs. modular design (Monday, 11 January)
Re: New split-out drafts vs. modular design (Monday, 11 January)
Re: The Canvas 2D API split (Monday, 11 January)
Re: Splitting out Communication Section (Monday, 11 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Monday, 11 January)
Re: splits, discussions, and manic behavior (Sunday, 10 January)
Re: sections removed, current and ongoing (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: splits, discussions, and manic behavior (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: New split-out drafts (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: New split-out drafts (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: New split-out drafts (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: New split-out drafts (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: remove the meter element (Friday, 8 January)
Re: ISSUE-93 (details): Return Details Element [HTML 5 spec] (Friday, 8 January)
Re: ISSUE-93 (details): Return Details Element [HTML 5 spec] (Friday, 8 January)
Re: sections removed, current and ongoing (Friday, 8 January)
Re: Removing Sections (Friday, 8 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Friday, 8 January)
Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-76 Microdata/RDFa (Friday, 8 January)
CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Friday, 8 January)
Working Group Decision on ISSUE-76 Microdata/RDFa (Thursday, 7 January)
Re: Taking another round at @summary (Wednesday, 6 January)
Re: Taking another round at @summary (Wednesday, 6 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Wednesday, 6 January)
Recently resolved issues (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: Browser implementations, prior to rec, used for justification (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: aged bugs (Monday, 4 January)
Re: ISSUE-87: attr-normalization - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Monday, 4 January)
Re: aged bugs (Monday, 4 January)
Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-35 aria-processing (ends 2009-12-17) (Monday, 4 January)
Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-35 aria-processing (ends 2009-12-17) (Monday, 4 January)
Re: ISSUE-87: attr-normalization - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Monday, 4 January)
Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-73 predefined-voc (ends 2009-12-17) (Monday, 4 January)
Re: ISSUE-10: video-smil - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Monday, 4 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Monday, 4 January)
Re: Updated DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Monday, 4 January)
Re: Updated DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Monday, 4 January)
Re: ISSUE-30 (Longdesc) Change Proposal (Monday, 4 January)
Re: Updated DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Monday, 4 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Monday, 4 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Sunday, 3 January)
Re: "Controlled environments" in scope for HTML working group (Sunday, 3 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Sunday, 3 January)
Re: "vastly increases reverse-engineering costs" and version proposal (Sunday, 3 January)
Re: "Controlled environments" in scope for HTML working group (Sunday, 3 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Sunday, 3 January)
Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Sunday, 3 January)
Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Sunday, 3 January)
Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Sunday, 3 January)
Re: HTML5 Recommendation document review comments (Sunday, 3 January)

Manu Sporny

Re: New round of Working Drafts (was Re: New split-out drafts) (Sunday, 31 January)
Re: New round of Working Drafts (was Re: New split-out drafts) (Saturday, 30 January)
Re: New round of Working Drafts (was Re: New split-out drafts) (Saturday, 30 January)
Re: HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Draft publishing request (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Draft publishing request (Friday, 22 January)
Re: HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Draft publishing request (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Draft publishing request (Wednesday, 13 January)
HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Draft publishing request (Tuesday, 12 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Friday, 8 January)

Mark Nottingham

Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Saturday, 23 January)
Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Saturday, 23 January)
Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Friday, 22 January)
Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Friday, 22 January)
Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Friday, 22 January)
Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership Change Proposal discussion (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership Change Proposal discussion (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 20 January)

Matt May

Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Friday, 22 January)
Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Friday, 15 January)

Matt Mullenweg

Re: <iframe doc=""> (Tuesday, 26 January)

Michael A. Puls II

Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: What defines a "plugin"? WRT sandboxing? (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Sunday, 10 January)
Re: Browser implementations, prior to rec, used for justification (Tuesday, 5 January)

Michael Cooper

Reminder: WAI-ARIA review deadline 2 February 2010 (Wednesday, 27 January)

Michael(tm) Smith

public-html-bugzilla list [was: ISSUE 93 (details): Return Details Element [HTML 5 spec]] (Monday, 25 January)
Re: ISSUE-93 (details): Return Details Element [HTML 5 spec] (Friday, 8 January)
Re: ISSUE-93 (details): Return Details Element [HTML 5 spec] (Friday, 8 January)

Patrick Garies

Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Monday, 4 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Monday, 4 January)

Paul Cotton

RE: New round of Working Drafts (was Re: New split-out drafts) (Saturday, 30 January)
RE: New round of Working Drafts (was Re: New split-out drafts) (Saturday, 30 January)
RE: HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Draft publishing request (Saturday, 30 January)
ISSUE-96 progress - Call for Change Proposals (Tuesday, 26 January)
RETRACTION: ISSUE-98 canvas2d - Call for Change Proposals (Tuesday, 26 January)
ISSUE-98 canvas2d - Call for Change Proposals (Tuesday, 26 January)
ISSUE-97 meter - Call for Change Proposals (Tuesday, 26 January)
ISSUE-94 webcoresplit - Call for Proposals (Tuesday, 26 January)
ISSUE-93 details - Call for Change Proposals (Tuesday, 26 January)
HTML WG F2F meeting (Tuesday, 26 January)
[VER 2] {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2010-01-21: AIs, CfC/CfPs, and heartbeat docs (Thursday, 21 January)
{agenda} HTML WG telcon 2010-01-21: AIs, CfC/CfPs, and heartbeat docs (Wednesday, 20 January)
RE: ISSUE-81: representation-vs-resource - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Tuesday, 19 January)
RE: HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Draft publishing request (Tuesday, 19 January)
RE: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Thursday, 7 January)
ACTION-166: Recheck status of issues 10 and 73 (Thursday, 7 January)
RE: Microdata (Wednesday, 6 January)
RE: Browser implementations, prior to rec, used for justification (Tuesday, 5 January)
HTML Tables Freeze Panes (Saturday, 2 January)

Philip Jägenstedt

Re: Suggestion for Microdata to RDF conversion (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Suggestion for Microdata to RDF conversion (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Suggestion for Microdata to RDF conversion (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Microdata to RDF conversion (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Monday, 18 January)
Microdata to RDF conversion (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Saturday, 16 January)
Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41) (Friday, 15 January)
Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41) (Friday, 15 January)
Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41) (Friday, 15 January)
Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41) (Friday, 15 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Sunday, 10 January)
Re: New split-out drafts (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Friday, 8 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Friday, 8 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Friday, 8 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Wednesday, 6 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Wednesday, 6 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Monday, 4 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Sunday, 3 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Sunday, 3 January)

Philip Taylor

Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: XSS risk from iframe@doc? (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: Fieldset disabled attribute and descendants (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: The Canvas 2D API split (Monday, 11 January)

Philippe Le Hegaret

Re: The Canvas 2D API split (Monday, 11 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Monday, 11 January)

Richard Ishida

RE: ACTION-161 / ISSUE 88: Multiple content languages (Thursday, 21 January)

Richard Schwerdtfeger

Re: Canvas Accessibility Next steps (Tuesday, 26 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Monday, 25 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: Canvas Accessibility Next steps (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Canvas Accessibility Next steps (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Canvas Accessibility Next steps (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Canvas Accessibility Next steps (Thursday, 21 January)
Fw: Canvas Accessibility Next steps (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: Minutes: HTML 5 Canvas Accessibility Call January 18, 2010 (text version) (Monday, 18 January)
Minutes: HTML 5 Canvas Accessibility Call (Monday, 18 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: Fw: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: Fw: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Tuesday, 12 January)
Re: Fw: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Sunday, 10 January)
Re: Fw: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Friday, 8 January)
Re: Fw: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Friday, 8 January)
Fw: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Thursday, 7 January)

Robert O'Callahan

Re: Remove .played from media elements (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Sunday, 10 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Friday, 8 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Friday, 8 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Wednesday, 6 January)
Re: Browser implementations, prior to rec, used for justification (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Sunday, 3 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Sunday, 3 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Sunday, 3 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Sunday, 3 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Sunday, 3 January)
Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Friday, 1 January)

Robin Berjon

Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Monday, 11 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Monday, 11 January)

Roy T. Fielding

Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Saturday, 23 January)
Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Friday, 22 January)
Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership Change Proposal discussion (Friday, 22 January)
Re: ISSUE-81: representation-vs-resource - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: ISSUE-81: representation-vs-resource - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: ISSUE-81: representation-vs-resource - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: text/sandboxed-html (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: CHANGE PROPOSAL: Remove ping and hyperlink auditing (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2) (Tuesday, 12 January)
Re: ISSUE-81: representation-vs-resource - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 6 January)
Re: ISSUE-88: content-language-multiple - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 6 January)

Sam Ruby

Re: Understanding the "applicable specifications" clause (was: Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41)) (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Request for group input on ISSUE-83 (figure and details captions) (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: XHTML Syntax Served as text/html (Was: Decentralized poetry markup (language)) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Change Proposals and Counter-Proposals (was Re: Issues 89 through 97) (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: Inadequate rationales (Was: Change Proposals and Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: Change Proposals and Counter-Proposals (was Re: Issues 89 through 97) (Monday, 18 January)
Re: ISSUE-81: representation-vs-resource - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Monday, 18 January)
Re: Change Proposals and Counter-Proposals (was Re: Issues 89 through 97) (Monday, 18 January)
Re: ISSUE-81: representation-vs-resource - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: ISSUE-30: longdesc - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Wednesday, 13 January)
ISSUE-30: longdesc - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Wednesday, 13 January)
ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2 - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Wednesday, 13 January)
Chairs Solicit Proposals for 89, 90, 91, 92, 95 **CORRECTION** (Wednesday, 13 January)
ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 13 January)
ISSUE-92 cleanuptable - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 13 January)
ISSUE-91 aside - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 13 January)
ISSUE-90 figure - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 13 January)
ISSUE-89 idioms - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Tuesday, 12 January)
Re: The Canvas 2D API split (Monday, 11 January)
Re: splits, discussions, and manic behavior (Sunday, 10 January)
Re: New split-out drafts (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: splits, discussions, and manic behavior (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: splits, discussions, and manic behavior (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: sections removed, current and ongoing (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: splits, discussions, and manic behavior (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: sections removed, current and ongoing (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: ISSUE-93 (details): Return Details Element [HTML 5 spec] (Friday, 8 January)
Re: sections removed, current and ongoing (Friday, 8 January)

Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich

RE: Browser implementations, prior to rec, used for justification (Wednesday, 6 January)
Browser implementations, prior to rec, used for justification (Tuesday, 5 January)
RE: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Tuesday, 5 January)

Shelley Powers

Re: Next issues to move forward on (Friday, 29 January)
Re: Next issues to move forward on (Thursday, 28 January)
Re: Next issues to move forward on (Thursday, 28 January)
Re: Next issues to move forward on (Thursday, 28 January)
Re: RETRACTION: ISSUE-98 canvas2d - Call for Change Proposals (Wednesday, 27 January)
Re: HTML WG F2F meeting (Wednesday, 27 January)
Re: removing the srcdoc (Tuesday, 26 January)
removing the srcdoc (Tuesday, 26 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Tuesday, 26 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: Request for group input on ISSUE-83 (figure and details captions) (Monday, 25 January)
Re: Request for group input on ISSUE-83 (figure and details captions) (Monday, 25 January)
Re: Request for group input on ISSUE-83 (figure and details captions) (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: Request for group input on ISSUE-83 (figure and details captions) (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Request for group input on ISSUE-83 (figure and details captions) (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Request for group input on ISSUE-83 (figure and details captions) (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Request for group input on ISSUE-83 (figure and details captions) (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Change Proposals and Counter-Proposals (was Re: Issues 89 through 97) (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: Change Proposals and Counter-Proposals (was Re: Issues 89 through 97) (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: Change Proposals and Counter-Proposals (was Re: Issues 89 through 97) (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: Change Proposals and Counter-Proposals (was Re: Issues 89 through 97) (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: Inadequate rationales (Was: Change Proposals and Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: Change Proposals and Counter-Proposals (was Re: Issues 89 through 97) (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: Change Proposals and Counter-Proposals (was Re: Issues 89 through 97) (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: Change Proposals and Counter-Proposals (was Re: Issues 89 through 97) (Monday, 18 January)
Re: Change Proposals and Counter-Proposals (was Re: Issues 89 through 97) (Monday, 18 January)
Re: Issues 89 through 97 (Monday, 18 January)
Re: Issues 89 through 97 (Monday, 18 January)
Re: Issues 89 through 97 (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: Request for group input on ISSUE-83 (figure and details captions) (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Saturday, 16 January)
Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Saturday, 16 January)
The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Saturday, 16 January)
Re: Issues 89 through 97 (Saturday, 16 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Saturday, 16 January)
Issues 89 through 97 (Friday, 15 January)
Re: Alternate proposals for ISSUE-83 (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: Chairs Solicit Proposals for 89, 90, 91, 92, 95 **CORRECTION** (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: Alternate proposals for ISSUE-83 (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: Alternate proposals for ISSUE-83 (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: hidden versus discoverable meta-data (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: ISSUE-30: longdesc - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: ISSUE-30: longdesc - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Draft publishing request (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Monday, 11 January)
Re: The Canvas 2D API split (Monday, 11 January)
Re: The Canvas 2D API split (Monday, 11 January)
Re: The Canvas 2D API split (Monday, 11 January)
Re: The Canvas 2D API split (Monday, 11 January)
Re: The Canvas 2D API split (Monday, 11 January)
Re: The Canvas 2D API split (Monday, 11 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Monday, 11 January)
Re: The Canvas 2D API split (Monday, 11 January)
Re: New split-out drafts vs. modular design (Monday, 11 January)
Re: New split-out drafts vs. modular design (Monday, 11 January)
Re: New split-out drafts vs. modular design (Monday, 11 January)
Re: New split-out drafts vs. modular design (Monday, 11 January)
Re: New split-out drafts vs. modular design (Monday, 11 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Monday, 11 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Sunday, 10 January)
Re: details should be a child (Sunday, 10 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Sunday, 10 January)
Splitting out Communication Section (Sunday, 10 January)
The Canvas 2D API split (Sunday, 10 January)
Re: splits, discussions, and manic behavior (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: splits, discussions, and manic behavior (Saturday, 9 January)
splits, discussions, and manic behavior (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: New split-out drafts (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: New split-out drafts (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: New split-out drafts (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: ISSUE-93 (details): Return Details Element [HTML 5 spec] (Friday, 8 January)
Re: ISSUE-93 (details): Return Details Element [HTML 5 spec] (Friday, 8 January)
label is now associated with progress and meter (Friday, 8 January)
Re: sections removed, current and ongoing (Friday, 8 January)
Re: ISSUE-93 (details): Return Details Element [HTML 5 spec] (Friday, 8 January)
Re: ISSUE-93 (details): Return Details Element [HTML 5 spec] (Friday, 8 January)
Re: ISSUE-93 (details): Return Details Element [HTML 5 spec] (Friday, 8 January)
Re: remove the meter element (Friday, 8 January)
remove the meter element (Friday, 8 January)
remove the progress element (Friday, 8 January)
Remove Hidden Attribute (Friday, 8 January)
Re: ISSUE-93 (details): Return Details Element [HTML 5 spec] (Friday, 8 January)
Re: sections removed, current and ongoing (Friday, 8 January)
Re: sections removed, current and ongoing (Friday, 8 January)
sections removed, current and ongoing (Friday, 8 January)
Re: Removing Sections (Friday, 8 January)
Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-76 Microdata/RDFa (Thursday, 7 January)
Re: Taking another round at @summary (Wednesday, 6 January)
"HTML5, it is a changin" performed (Wednesday, 6 January)
Re: Browser implementations, prior to rec, used for justification (Wednesday, 6 January)
Bob Dylan meets HTML5 (Tuesday, 5 January)
Microdata (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: Browser implementations, prior to rec, used for justification (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: Browser implementations, prior to rec, used for justification (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: Browser implementations, prior to rec, used for justification (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: aged bugs (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: Browser implementations, prior to rec, used for justification (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: Browser implementations, prior to rec, used for justification (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: Browser implementations, prior to rec, used for justification (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: aged bugs (Monday, 4 January)
Re: aged bugs (Monday, 4 January)
aged bugs (Monday, 4 January)

Silvia Pfeiffer

Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Saturday, 30 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Friday, 15 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Saturday, 9 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Friday, 8 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Friday, 8 January)
Re: "HTML5, it is a changin" performed (Wednesday, 6 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Wednesday, 6 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Tuesday, 5 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Monday, 4 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Monday, 4 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Sunday, 3 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Sunday, 3 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Sunday, 3 January)
Re: Should <video> buffer control be tri-state? (Sunday, 3 January)
Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Sunday, 3 January)
Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Friday, 1 January)
Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Friday, 1 January)
Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Friday, 1 January)
Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Friday, 1 January)

Simon Pieters

Remove .played from media elements (Tuesday, 19 January)
order of arguments in window.postMessage() (Thursday, 14 January)

sird@rckc.at

Re: text/sandboxed-html (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: text/sandboxed-html (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: text/sandboxed-html (Wednesday, 13 January)

Smylers

Re: Trying to use <iframe srcdoc= > (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Friday, 22 January)
Re: XHTML Syntax Served as text/html (Was: Decentralized poetry markup (language)) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: XHTML Syntax Served as text/html (Was: Decentralized poetry markup (language)) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: draft HTML5: Techniques for the provision of text alternatives (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Saturday, 16 January)

Steven Faulkner

Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: ISSUE-85 - anchor-roles - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Friday, 22 January)
Re: ACTION-138 ARIA matrix (was: Re: [VER 2] {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2010-01-21: AIs, CfC/CfPs, and heartbeat docs) (Friday, 22 January)
Opera investigating implementation of image map on canvas (Friday, 22 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: draft HTML5: Techniques for the provision of text alternatives (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: draft HTML5: Techniques for the provision of text alternatives (Tuesday, 19 January)
draft HTML5: Techniques for the provision of text alternatives (Monday, 18 January)
new bug add conformance criteria info to header/banner (Sunday, 10 January)

T.V Raman

Tab Atkins Jr.

Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Friday, 29 January)
Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Friday, 29 January)
Re: Comparison between <sandbox> and @sandbox (Friday, 29 January)
Re: HTML WG F2F meeting (Wednesday, 27 January)
Re: removing the srcdoc (Tuesday, 26 January)
Re: removing the srcdoc (Tuesday, 26 January)
Re: removing the srcdoc (Tuesday, 26 January)
Re: removing the srcdoc (Tuesday, 26 January)
Re: Trying to use <iframe srcdoc= > (Monday, 25 January)
Re: Trying to use <iframe srcdoc= > (Monday, 25 January)
Re: Trying to use <iframe srcdoc= > (Monday, 25 January)
Re: Trying to use <iframe srcdoc= > (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Monday, 25 January)
Re: Request for group input on ISSUE-83 (figure and details captions) (Monday, 25 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: <summary> element and Issue 32 (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: What defines a "plugin"? WRT sandboxing? (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: <summary> element and Issue 32 (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: Disallow plug-ins in text/html-sandboxed? (was: Re: text/sandboxed-html) (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: Disallow plug-ins in text/html-sandboxed? (was: Re: text/sandboxed-html) (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: spec verbosity and algorithms (Saturday, 23 January)
Re: spec verbosity and algorithms (Saturday, 23 January)
Re: Suggestion for Microdata to RDF conversion (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Suggestion for Microdata to RDF conversion (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Understanding the "applicable specifications" clause (was: Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41)) (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Discussion on Change Proposal for ISSUE-66 (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Understanding the "applicable specifications" clause (was: Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41)) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Understanding the "applicable specifications" clause (was: Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41)) (Wednesday, 20 January)
Re: Decentralized poetry markup (language) (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: draft HTML5: Techniques for the provision of text alternatives (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: draft HTML5: Techniques for the provision of text alternatives (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: Change Proposals and Counter-Proposals (was Re: Issues 89 through 97) (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: Change Proposals and Counter-Proposals (was Re: Issues 89 through 97) (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: Change Proposals and Counter-Proposals (was Re: Issues 89 through 97) (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: Change Proposals and Counter-Proposals (was Re: Issues 89 through 97) (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: Change Proposals and Counter-Proposals (was Re: Issues 89 through 97) (Tuesday, 19 January)
Re: Change Proposals and Counter-Proposals (was Re: Issues 89 through 97) (Monday, 18 January)
Re: Change Proposals and Counter-Proposals (was Re: Issues 89 through 97) (Monday, 18 January)
Re: Fieldset disabled attribute and descendants (Monday, 18 January)
Re: Issues 89 through 97 (Monday, 18 January)
Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41) (Monday, 18 January)
Re: XSS risk from iframe@doc? (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41) (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41) (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41) (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: Request for group input on ISSUE-83 (figure and details captions) (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41) (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: Issue 83 Change Proposal - caption attribute (Saturday, 16 January)
Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41) (Friday, 15 January)
Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41) (Friday, 15 January)
Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Friday, 15 January)
Re: Alternate proposals for ISSUE-83 (Friday, 15 January)
Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Friday, 15 January)
Re: hidden versus discoverable meta-data (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2 - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2 - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: ISSUE-83 alternate Change Proposal - fcaption and dlabel elements (or similar) (Wednesday, 13 January)
Issue 83 Change Proposal - <fbody>, <dbody> (Wednesday, 13 January)
Issue 83 Change Proposal - caption attribute (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: <iframe doc=""> (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Tuesday, 12 January)
Re: remove the meter element (Friday, 8 January)
Re: sections removed, current and ongoing (Friday, 8 January)
Re: sections removed, current and ongoing (Friday, 8 January)
Re: sections removed, current and ongoing (Friday, 8 January)
Re: Removing Sections (Friday, 8 January)
Re: HTML Tables Freeze Panes (Sunday, 3 January)

Tantek Celik

Re: Suggestion for Microdata to RDF conversion (Friday, 22 January)
Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership Change Proposal discussion (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: hidden versus discoverable meta-data (Thursday, 14 January)

Tantek Çelik

Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership Change Proposal discussion (Thursday, 21 January)

Thomas Broyer

Re: <iframe doc=""> (Sunday, 24 January)
Re: text/sandboxed-html (Friday, 15 January)
Re: [Bug 8611] Consider adding a full schema to H:TML (Tuesday, 5 January)

Toby Inkster

Re: The harm that can come if the W3C supports publication of competing specs (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41) (Sunday, 17 January)
Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41) (Friday, 15 January)
Re: hidden versus discoverable meta-data (Thursday, 14 January)
Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41) (Thursday, 14 January)
Re: text/sandboxed-html (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (Tuesday, 12 January)
Re: [Bug 8611] Consider adding a full schema to H:TML (Wednesday, 6 January)

Last message date: Sunday, 31 January 2010 21:11:42 UTC