W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2010

Re: <iframe doc="">

From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:50:32 -0500
Message-ID: <4B4E3218.5070108@w3.org>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Hi, folks-

Tab Atkins Jr. wrote (on 1/13/10 10:23 AM):
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Leonard
> Rosenthol<lrosenth@adobe.com>  wrote:
>> I don't understand how you can assume that the destination of the
>> doc URL is going to be text/HTML?  Why couldn't the iFrame be
>> pointing to an SVG image, for example, or a PDF?  Those are also
>> valid (and in the latter case of PDF, quite common) things one
>> would put in an iFrame and wish to refer to...
> @doc doesn't take a url, it takes literal html code (with quotes
> escaped).  It is intended to help with the use of multiple<iframe>s
> on a page, especially @sandbox'd ones, so that you don't incur
> multiple network requests but still get the security benefits of
> framing the content such as blog comments.

The question still remains... would @doc allow SVG code, for example?

-Doug Schepers
W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs
Received on Wednesday, 13 January 2010 20:50:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:56 UTC