- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 07:56:55 -0800
- To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
On Jan 4, 2010, at 6:54 AM, David Carlisle wrote: > > > > >> On Nov 19, 2009, at 9:51 AM, Paul Cotton wrote: > > The archives confirm that that announcement was indeed sent (to > public-html), but shouldn't the process ensure that the original > person > who went to the trouble of raising the issue be informed of the > pending > (and actual) closure? Being subscribed to public-html is not a > prerequisite for submitting an issue to bugzilla. We'll do our best, but we can't guarantee we will always find all the right people to notify. > > I just happened to notice your message in the archives. I did not see > Paul's announcement at the time it was sent. > > > If the bug had been kept in bugzilla, the original submitter would > automatically be informed of changes of status. Since the group's > process > is to move the issues to tracker there should be process in place to > keep the original submitter informed, either by direct email, or by > touching the bugzilla entry so that the bug cc list is automatically > informed. > > > As for this particular issue, I'm undecided, I may decide to re-open > and > submit a change proposal. It's closed without prejudice, so if you present a Change Proposal we can certainly re-open it. Regards, Maciej
Received on Monday, 4 January 2010 15:57:28 UTC