Re: ISSUE-87: attr-normalization - Chairs Solicit Proposals

On Jan 4, 2010, at 6:54 AM, David Carlisle wrote:

>> On Nov 19, 2009, at 9:51 AM, Paul Cotton wrote:
> The archives confirm that that announcement was indeed sent (to
> public-html), but shouldn't the process ensure that the original  
> person
> who went to the trouble of raising the issue be informed of the  
> pending
> (and actual) closure? Being subscribed to public-html is not a
> prerequisite for submitting an issue to bugzilla.

We'll do our best, but we can't guarantee we will always find all the  
right people to notify.

> I just happened to notice your message in the archives. I did not see
> Paul's announcement at the time it was sent.
> If the bug had been kept in bugzilla, the original submitter would
> automatically be informed of changes of status. Since the group's  
> process
> is to move the issues to tracker there should be process in place to
> keep the original submitter informed, either by direct email, or by
> touching the bugzilla entry  so that the bug cc list is automatically
> informed.
> As for this particular issue, I'm undecided, I may decide to re-open  
> and
> submit a change proposal.

It's closed without prejudice, so if you present a Change Proposal we  
can certainly re-open it.


Received on Monday, 4 January 2010 15:57:28 UTC