W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2010

Re: <iframe doc="">

From: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:13:30 -0600
Message-ID: <643cc0271001250813x4157042of32c23a2cd36ad73@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Lars Gunther <gunther@keryx.se>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Adam states that this functionality is for ads, you state it is not.
> Reread his message, and mine.  Adam stated that one use for @sandbox
> was for ads.  I stated that @srcdoc was not for ads.  These two
> statements do not conflict in any way.
> ~TJ

I actually did not conflate srcdoc and sandbox. My initial comments were
about srcdoc, but then you all brought up sandbox.

I'm still waiting other answers.

Received on Monday, 25 January 2010 16:14:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:08 UTC