- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 11:59:31 -0800
- To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Cc: HTML WG Public List <public-html@w3.org>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Hi Leif, On Jan 11, 2010, at 11:51 AM, Leif Halvard Silli wrote: > I must unfortunately change my support for the publication of a FPWD > of > Microdata to an objection. I have one condition, with two alternative > solutions, for lifting my objection: > > EITHER: Solicit with the community behind HTML+RDFa about changing > the > title "HTML+RDFa" to e.g. "HTML5+RDFa", "HTML5 RDFa" or "HTML5 with > RDFa" (or another name that includes "HTML5"). Then I could accept > "HTML5 Microdata" as title of the FPWD of Microdata. (Both title and > subtitle count as "title") > > OR: Solicit with the community behind Microdata to change the title > of > the FPWD to "HTML+Microdata" or some other name which do not include > the word "HTML5". (Both title and subtitle count as "title") I understand where you're coming from, but is this really an FPWD blocker? It seems like something that could be handled by filing bugs against either or both specs. I note that HTML+RDFa already has a bugzilla component. I especially wouldn't want to block publication of Microdata on an action by a different editor. Alternately: Ian, would you be OK with changing the title from "HTML5 Microdata" to either "HTML+Microdata" or "HTML Microdata" or something similar? Regards, Maciej
Received on Monday, 11 January 2010 20:00:07 UTC