RE: ACTION-161 / ISSUE 88: Multiple content languages

I'm a little worried by the confusion surrounding who is doing what wrt this
Lief indicated to the HTML WG already that the i18n WG had volunteered to
write this change proposal, and that he was passing the baton to us. I had
the action to write it.  I was on vacation for three weeks over the
Christmas/New Year period, out of the email loop, and as soon as I returned
I wrote a proposal and had it reviewed by the i18n WG. See . 

In the meantime, it appears that the HTML WG discussed the issue and
(without consultation with the i18n WG) the writing of the Change Proposal
was reassigned to Roy Fielding, with a deadline of 26 January.  So I
contacted Roy, and he has promised to send me his input to the proposal so
that I can integrate it in the aforementioned document.

Maciej, Paul, I have had the feeling for some time now that my emails are
somehow not being heard, so could I ask you to reply to this email to
confirm that you have received it and indicate whether my understanding is
correct that Roy is currently the torch holder with a deadline of 26 Jan, or
whether we should move the ownership back to the i18n WG.


Richard Ishida
Internationalization Lead
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [mailto:public-i18n-core-
>] On Behalf Of Martin Kliehm
> Sent: 21 January 2010 15:59
> To:
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: ACTION-161 / ISSUE 88: Multiple content languages
> Paul Cotton wrote:
> > b) ACTION-161 on Maciej Stachowiak: Monitor Deadline: Leif Halvard Silli
> to Write a Change Proposal for ISSUE-88
> >   due 2010-01-26
> It seems that you overlooked that the W3C i18n WG, more specifically
> Richard Ishida, has written a proposal and offered to write more:
> announce/2010JanMar/0001.html
> I would suggest to assign this issue to Richard / the i18n WG as they
> have written already a lot about this topic and are the most qualified
> group for this.
> Cheers,
>    Martin

Received on Thursday, 21 January 2010 16:41:18 UTC