Re: hidden versus discoverable meta-data

On Jan 14, 2010, at 3:37 PM, Toby Inkster wrote:

> On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 20:06 +0000, Tantek Celik wrote:
>> Even TimBL is now advocating RDFa now, not RDF
> Perhaps being pernickety, but that's like saying that somebody is
> advocating using PNGs instead of pictures. PNGs are pictures; and RDFa
> is RDF.

Given the context of Tantek's message, I assume he was contrasting to  
RDF/XML or other standalone serializations that would constitute a  
"side file" or go in a comment.


Received on Thursday, 14 January 2010 23:40:14 UTC