W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2010

Re: hidden versus discoverable meta-data

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:39:34 -0800
Cc: tantek@cs.stanford.edu, John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>, public-html-a11y@w3.org, public-html@w3.org
Message-id: <3714AB7B-5757-45B4-B7A2-0483F8E5B3EA@apple.com>
To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>

On Jan 14, 2010, at 3:37 PM, Toby Inkster wrote:

> On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 20:06 +0000, Tantek Celik wrote:
>> Even TimBL is now advocating RDFa now, not RDF
> Perhaps being pernickety, but that's like saying that somebody is
> advocating using PNGs instead of pictures. PNGs are pictures; and RDFa
> is RDF.

Given the context of Tantek's message, I assume he was contrasting to  
RDF/XML or other standalone serializations that would constitute a  
"side file" or go in a comment.

Received on Thursday, 14 January 2010 23:40:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:07 UTC