Lars Gunther, Mon, 11 Jan 2010 12:09:07 +0100: > 2010-01-11 10:28, Lachlan Hunt skrev: >> The WHATWG has operated for years without having to adopt a formal >> change procedure like we have here because the group is not as >> dysfunctional this one. > > Or you could say that it had a very narrow subset of all > HTML-stakeholders in it - and those who did not belong in that subset > soon learned that their ideas were shut down. > > The HTML WG is perhaps "dysfunctional" by the criteria that it is > very much caught up in procedure and complaining, but that is looking > at the symptoms, not the cause. The WHAT WG culture is definately not > without is flaws and is one (of many) contributing factors. +1 Btw, perhaps the MD supporters themselves could describe which effect they think that the WG decision w.r.t. MD should have? By this I also indicate that to suggest that, as a consequence, the entire HTML 5 is "split-out" into sub specs, is not a reasonable effect. -- leif halvard silliReceived on Monday, 11 January 2010 11:39:27 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:07 UTC