- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:38:37 +0200
- To: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
- Cc: "Toby Inkster" <tai@g5n.co.uk>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On Jan 15, 2010, at 11:06, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > As a side note, I'm not sure what kind of page one would find at http://example.com/CarML/html5 in your example, but what is possibly missing from microdata is some formal way of describing the vocabulary to automate validation. Caution! That way lie permathreads including long-lived TAG issues. http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/8 Hosting XSD files at XML namespace URIs didn't turn out to be a success. > I think it's premature to standardize anything though, experimentation is necessary. I was planning on adding Microdata vocabulary support to Validator.nu by mapping the Microdata tree to an XML infoset and then applying RELAX NG validation to the synthetic infoset. I haven't evaluated the recent edits to Microdata to see if this approach is still feasible. In any case, I wouldn't want to require other implementors to support this hack for validating Microdata. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Friday, 15 January 2010 13:39:11 UTC