On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 3:38 PM, James Graham <jgraham@opera.com> wrote: > My experience is that having a single spec is rather helpful; I typically > look things up in the single page version of the spec since this makes > searching and cross-referencing easier. I find the organization of the spec > into chapters to provide sufficient granularity of concepts and, in cases > where I am clear what I am looking for, I can look at the relevant chapter > in the multipage version of the spec so as not to incur the overhead of > loading the whole document. I have also observed situations in which people > have misunderstood specs split out from HTML5 because they have failed to > follow the cross-references when necessary. > > It seems to me that, neglecting primarily political concerns, a monolithic > spec that is well structured and available in both single-page and > multi-page versions is rather similar to a spec that is split into many > different documents except in the latter case it is harder to get a single > document containing all the material one might need to understand the > HTML/DOM part of the web stack and it is harder to find the right material > if one doesn't already know where it lives. > > > +1Received on Sunday, 10 January 2010 00:07:25 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:07 UTC