W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2010

Re: Understanding the "applicable specifications" clause (was: Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41))

From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:21:15 +0100
To: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Cc: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
Message-ID: <20100120182115644505.612bd99c@xn--mlform-iua.no>

Leif Halvard Silli, Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:10:48 +0100:

[...]
> OK. I don't know, but I guess this so because the people behind 
> Validator.w3.org didn't find XForms to be valid

Sorry: I meant "relevant" - not "valid".

> on the Web? But what  does this prove?
-- 
leif halvard silli

Received on Wednesday, 20 January 2010 17:21:48 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Smylers: "Re: XHTML Syntax Served as text/html (Was: Decentralized poetry markup (language))"
Previous message: Leif Halvard Silli: "Re: XHTML Syntax Served as text/html (Was: Decentralized poetry markup (language))"
In reply to: Leif Halvard Silli: "Re: Understanding the "applicable specifications" clause (was: Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41))"
Next in thread: Tab Atkins Jr.: "Re: Understanding the "applicable specifications" clause (was: Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41))"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:08 UTC