Re: Understanding the "applicable specifications" clause (was: Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41))

Leif Halvard Silli, Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:10:48 +0100:

[...]
> OK. I don't know, but I guess this so because the people behind 
> Validator.w3.org didn't find XForms to be valid

Sorry: I meant "relevant" - not "valid".

> on the Web? But what  does this prove?
-- 
leif halvard silli

Received on Wednesday, 20 January 2010 17:21:48 UTC