Le 16 janv. 2010 à 01:08, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit : >> It seems a lot of trouble to make a global attribute for only one construct. > > Any more trouble than adding a new element? I don't see the distinction. Same (I mentionned it the bottom of the mail) I would not add a single element just for the caption of a figure (for the sake of not reinventing docbook). >> On <time for="linkme" datetime="2010-01-11">January 11th, >> 2010</time>, there was a wonderful thing happening. >> >> <figure> >> <img src="foo" alt="something foo" id="linkme"/> >> </figure> > > That's not exactly a caption for the figure anymore. At least, I've > never seen a figure captioned like that in real life. By "real life", you mean on the Web or in books? > If you have suggestions for names, they'll be very welcome on Maciej's > change proposal. heading, desc, cartouche, gloss are all not used terms, but I would not encourage to use them only for figure. That is my main worry for now. > We're using fcaption and figcaption right now for > lack of anything better, despite quite a bit of suggestions. -- Karl Dubost Montréal, QC, Canada http://www.la-grange.net/karl/Received on Saturday, 16 January 2010 13:34:27 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:07 UTC