- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:39:51 -0500
- To: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On 01/29/2010 04:58 PM, Larry Masinter wrote: > As I noted previously, I don't think W3C HTML WG should commit > to working on or publishing microdata at this time, without > resolving the overall issue of extensibility or Microdata > vs RDFa vs. both. > > To the question of whether to publish the document in W3C > as a FPWD (given that the document has been widely announced > as available from WHATWG anywhere) I think at a minimum it > needs analogous edits as went into the RDFa document I support these edits for the following reasons: - It is more descriptive of the current status of RDFa, Microdata, and decentralized extensibility than the previous text. - It doesn't prevent further Microdata development, but is a clear indication that Microdata is far from being published as a REC. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Monarch - Next Generation REST Web Services http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2009/12/14/monarch/
Received on Saturday, 30 January 2010 02:40:20 UTC