- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 11:07:31 -0600
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > So, jokes aside, when large sections just go away it would really be nice to > get an announcement before things just happen. Exactly. The bug database is somewhat hidden away - we don't even get an email to the list when new bugs get added, just when certain attributes get changed. Having at least some discussion on the list allows those of us who don't have the time to manage the 3+ asynchronous discussion areas for HTML the ability to comment on it and provide rationale. Most changes that go through the bug database don't need such; they're either minor or technical. Bugs being rejected similarly don't need such, as the submitted can then bring it up themselves, as they're following the bug. But when a change like this occurs on a bug with no discussion whatsoever, it's jarring. Having to go through the rigamarole of raising issues which create a disproportionate amount of work for the WG is definitely suboptimal. ~TJ
Received on Friday, 8 January 2010 17:07:59 UTC