- From: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:30:55 -0800
- To: "'Maciej Stachowiak'" <mjs@apple.com>, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
- CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Adobe is certainly committed to working with this committee and others to develop the necessary specifications, APIs, etc. that would ensure that our plugins would operate correctly with @sandbox. Maciej - your company is also a vendor of popular plugins (eg. Quicktime). Ian, yours is now doing them for 3D and others. Are you two also willing to participate? If so, that would cover about 90+% of the major plugins in use today. So what is the correct course of action to see that move forward? Leonard -----Original Message----- From: Maciej Stachowiak [mailto:mjs@apple.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 2:45 PM To: Adam Barth Cc: Leonard Rosenthol; Ian Hickson; public-html@w3.org WG Subject: Re: text/sandboxed-html That's my intent with suggesting allow-plugins - it would only allow those that understand @sandbox and have indicated this to the browser in some way. But I think we should design the mechanism for plugins to participate in enforcing the sandbox and to indicate that they will do so, and see if any plugin vendor is actually interested in implementing that functionality, before we add allow-plugins. I would not want to add it speculatively, if it initially has the effect of not allowing any actual plugins. Regards, Maciej
Received on Wednesday, 13 January 2010 20:31:31 UTC