- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 11:54:07 -0800
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Jan 8, 2010, at 9:27 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > > Can I just go ahead and say that all of the section-removal bugs are > "major"? I'm pretty sure I highly disagree with all of them. I > *really* don't want to cause the WG all the additional work that > Issues do, because it's completely unnecessary and rather silly. I think if a topic hasn't gotten significant email discussion, and may be controversial, then it's a good idea to make sure the mailing list gets some notice. But as far as I can tell, Shelley has done this for all of her potentially controversial bugs, by tagging them NE. For whatever reason, this one did not seem to draw any attention, though many of Shelley's other bugs have drawn extensive comments. In addition to the Issue process, another option when you disagree with the outcome is to reopen a bug with new information for the editor. That's happening in the case of <details>. So please comment in the bug if you feel strongly. I suspect this one is going to the issue tracker one way or another though. Regards, Maciej
Received on Friday, 8 January 2010 19:54:46 UTC