W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2010

over specification is anti-competitive (blog post)

From: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:45:15 -0800
To: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D5FE8C2@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com>
> Maybe this is off-topic for this list, but I've seen this notion of
> over-specification being anti-competitive raised before.  Can you
> explain why that is specifically?


Not entirely off-topic, but we've been encouraged to keep 
discussion to particular issues rather than general 
principles, so I think talking about the general issue
should be done elsewhere. (www-tag@w3.org would be OK with
me since I think it's a general architectural principle for
specifications and not just specific to HTML5.)

The particular issue was ISSUE-56


The implementations of URI processing that I've seen in the
past don't match the specific algorithm that used to be in
the HTML5 document, and I'd like some evidence that the
change proposal:
is actually "woefully inadequate" for anything.

(reminder http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8207#c6 )

Received on Wednesday, 27 January 2010 20:45:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:57 UTC