W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2010

Re: Decentralised extensibility idea (ISSUE-41)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:09:53 -0700
Message-ID: <dd0fbad1001150909v6605817dsa75a6d1ca287c95f@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>, Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>, Philip J├Ągenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> The second isn't really distributed extensibility, because the
>> browsers have to support each vocab manually.
> I disagree that this isn't D.E. You seem to assume the D.E. implies some
> kind of code-on-demand, which IMHO is not what most people think. Otherwise
> XML namespaces wouldn't qualify either.

I'm making a slightly subtler point.  Microdata, RDFa, and even XML
Namespaces can all be processed with a generic processor that has no
information about the actual vocabularies being used.  You can just
say "Find me all the items/triples/namespaced elements on the page",
and it can do it.  Thus the extensibility granted by these
technologies is distributed, as no central authority has to recognize
and bless your vocab for it to be processable by generic tools.

However, if this proposal requires tools to recognize particular
@profile values before it can even tell that there *is* data embedded
in the page, let alone *extract* it, then this does not seem to be
distributed in any significant way.

Received on Friday, 15 January 2010 17:16:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:07 UTC