- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 21:04:14 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > On Jan 4, 2010, at 8:33 AM, Laura Carlson wrote: > > > > The following accessibility bugs were recently downgraded from P2 to > > P3 without explanation: > > For what it's worth, the "Priority" field in Bugzilla has no meaning > with respect to the HTML WG Decision Policy. If any of the editors want > to use this field for personal tracking purpose, they are free to do so. > > However this particular change seems to have confused a number of > people, so if Ian wants to explain his use of priority fields, or at > least let the WG know that we don't need to be concerned about this > field, that would be helpful. I was normalising the priority field so that I could use it to prioritise work; for example, non-editorial bugs that affect implementors are more important than non-editorial bugs that affect authors, which are themselves more important than any kind of editorial bug. When I get requests to prioritise non-editorial bugs I can use the priority field to keep track of these requests. In general all bugs should be "normal P3" unless I've received a request to prioritise something. HTH, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 4 January 2010 21:04:44 UTC