- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:25:01 -0800
- To: Bruce Lawson <brucel@opera.com>
- Cc: HTML WG Public List <public-html@w3.org>
- Message-id: <FDFD29D2-8D7F-40B1-AAE9-2505F29D30BA@apple.com>
On Jan 11, 2010, at 2:51 PM, Bruce Lawson wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 22:16:58 -0000, Maciej Stachowiak > <mjs@apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On ISSUE-83 dt-dd-semantics, it seems like many people roughly >> agree with Shelley's reasoning on Shelley's issue, but prefer other >> alternatives to the proposed "fltcap" element. >> >> Lachlan Hunt started a wiki page to come up with shared rationale, >> and flesh out the various proposals: >> http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Change_Proposal:_figure_and_details >> > [snip] >> >> If anyone would like to write up these other ideas, or contribute >> to the shared rationale, or improve an existing writeup, or add a >> new idea, please feel free to do so. > > Is footer allowed as a child of details and figure? It appears so, > as the spec for footer http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/sections.html#the-footer-element > says "The footer element represents a footer for its nearest > ancestor sectioning content or sectioning root element", and > sectioning root elements include details and figure (http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/sections.html#sectioning-root > ) > > So could we use footer where label was originally proposed? As it's > as super special new html5 construct, there won't be any weird > legacy parsing problems. It kind of makes sense in figure: > > <figure> > <img ..> > <footer>Hixie and Shelley singing "I'd like to teach the world to > sing" at the WHATWG Xmas party</footer> > </figure> > > And slightly less sense in details (you naturally gravitate towards > <header>, even tho the spec for footer already says "Footers don't > necessarily have to appear at the end of a section"): > > <details> > <footer>Click here for expando loveliness!</footer> > <p>Peekaboo!</p> > </details> That doesn't really align with my personal sense of design taste. I don't think <footer> is a good semantic fit. But if you'd like to plug that proposal into the wiki, feel free! Regards, Maciej
Received on Monday, 11 January 2010 23:25:37 UTC